alt.languages.englishPrev. Next
Re: fishes?
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net) 2004/05/24 03:48

Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 11:48:57 +0200
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: fishes?
References: <40b1b1ad$1@news.broadpark.no> <40b1c48e$0$7709$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <40b1c48e$0$7709$636a15ce@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.80-202-161.nextgentel.com
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.80-202-161.nextgentel.com
Message-ID: <40b1c691$1@news.broadpark.no>
X-Trace: news.broadpark.no 1085392529 153.80-202-161.nextgentel.com (24 May 2004 11:55:29 +0200)
Lines: 9
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:305

> Well, 'fishes' does exist. However, in British English, it is only used
> while talking about different species of fish. The same as 'fruits'.

This may sound right, as the book is about fish species in the cichlid
family, Cichlidae.

Thanks

roy

Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite