Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "John of Aix" <j.murphy@nospamlibertysurf.fr>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: grammar: "What you need to do is give me a kiss!"--Why not giving?!
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:49:30 +0200
Organization: Wanadoo, l'internet avec France Telecom
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <c8l4qc$nct$1@news-reader5.wanadoo.fr>
References: <x6irc.82219$325.1794478@news20.bellglobal.com>
Reply-To: "John of Aix" <j.murphy@nospamlibertysurf.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mix-avignon-201-3-150.w193-248.abo.wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: news-reader5.wanadoo.fr 1085150860 23965 193.248.53.150 (21 May 2004 14:47:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 2004 14:47:40 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:294
x6irc.82219$325.1794478@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Hi,
> As I thought, two verbs can't be put together with the original form,
> but why here:
> What you need to do is give me a kiss!
> I think it should be "is giving...".
No, it should be '...is to give me a kiss' but the 'to' is understood so
often left out in such a statement. The sense of the phrase is, of course,
'what you should do....'.
> What kind of grammar phenomenon.
|
|