On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 02:53:58 GMT, "Zealot the Crazy Lui"
<ktwilson9999@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>I think I started typing something and didn't finish... but it was that plus
>the rest of what I said in the previous post that you handily forgot to
>mention.
That's because it was equally inane. :P
>(I described something with an engine/motor, and you didn't mention anything
>about a car being able to move after that...)
So, if it moves and has a motor, it's a car? That sure clarifies
things.
>> You've reversed the word. It's 'on'. Like in 'right on'. :P
>
>Eh, no... NO, damnit :P
See, you just did it again, right there. Don't worry, practice makes
perfect. :)
>Eh? I was responding to this bit:
And contradicting your own definition in the process. :)
>> You also have more people. We have the same hamburger to citizen
>> ration, I'm sure.
>
>Which is what I was inclined to disagree with.
We have the same yearning for malnutrition as you.
>If that's true... then why do they still try to sell the stuff?
Many places doesn't, that's for sure. It's just not as essential as it
may be in the land of the fat. :P
>I'm talking about the crap "meat" that still tries to be meat but is more
>likely mushed up animal bits compressed into something that resembles real
>meat.
Ah, the hamburgers. :P
>Comparatively, yes.
I guess our gas stations are just superior to yours in that respect.
>Exactly what? You were complaining about ground beef being considered beef,
>and I was arguing if you didn't ground some of the bits they wouldn't be
>very palletable. Then you said something about them selling more expensive
>bits, and I said they did sell more expensive bits... but they're more
>expensive. (duh) The more espensive stuff typically tends to be called steak
>(different varieties of steak are available, they can be called other things
>like fillet minion etc.), and the "other" stuff is beef... which is more or
>less the same as ground beef, but not ground up. And you're complaining that
>ground beef isn't real beef?
A steak isn't ground up and still edible (and superior in taste to a
hamburger). So, why is it that meat that's not ground is unedible in
your opinion?
Geez, you're really pushing the limit to how many times you can
contradict yourself in the same post. :P
>Whattever... Salmon is crap. I've had (not smoked) salmon before, and it's
>horrible. You're never going to convince me smoked salmon is something that
>tastes good, so we might as well declare a cease-fire on that topic...
*lol*
Regular Salmon tastes nothing like the smoked variety. I had a feeling
you had zilch clue on the subject, and behold, I was right. :)
>I've had extra-less "sandwiches" before. They're.... terrible.
'Nothing' and 'overkill' can meet halfway.
--
E. Byers
breathing like the drowning man
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 |
|