On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:58:02 GMT, "Zealot the Crazy Lui"
<ktwilson9999@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
>Hamburgers always come under the "sandwich" catagory, wherever you find
>them. Thus, they are a form of sandwich.
I put as much faith in your classification system as most record
stores' ability to slap anything they're not completely sure about
into the indie section. Categorization is for chumps. A hamburger does
not a sandwich make, young padawan.
>Hamburgers tend to be an American
>"art form," so I can claim to be a more credible authority on them than you
>:)
Oh give me a break, they have the same exact burger joints over here.
>Hamburgers are ground beef. Ta da.
>Not are hamburgers are a la McDonalds.
That's just what the brochures tell you. :P
Next thing you'll be claiming sausages are made of actual meat.
>What? I like the taste of those things. Tomatoes don't have much taste, and
>lettuce has none. Mustard is excellent, and so are pickles. A sandwich isn't
>a a sandwich without pickles, mustard, mayo, tomatoes, lettuce, and cheese
>:)
With all that crap on, you wouldn't need (or taste) the meat.
>Errrr, Smoked Salmon... it just smells bad. It's too fishy, damnit.
Uh huh...well, I seem to know a lot more about hamburgers than you
know about salmon, that's for sure.
>I wouldn't want any sandwich without basic sandwich essentials... (the
>aforementioned things related to pickles)
I like the taste of a lot of things as well, but I wouldn't put all of
them on the same sandwich.
--
E. Byers
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 |
|