Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3F7BFDC5.18A5@adelphia.net>
From: Douglas S <duglis@adelphia.net>
Reply-To: duglis@adelphia.net
Organization: @adelphia.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.games
Subject: Re: Conquest of the Empire: Re-release by Eagle Games
References: <65f04254.0310010926.78e67009@posting.google.com> <vnndaorn8p0s9e@corp.supernews.com> <3F7BC7DA.8CF31258@nokia.com> <3F7BF658.A27DD7C@myrealbox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:23:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.65.93.98
X-Complaints-To: abuse@adelphia.net
X-Trace: news3.news.adelphia.net 1065090227 68.65.93.98 (Thu, 02 Oct 2003 06:23:47 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 06:23:47 EDT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.games:258
Tony Nardo wrote:
>
> Michael Abramowski wrote:
>
> > Michael Ward wrote:
> > >
> > > [...] When EG first came on the scene several of their games looked
> > > interesting to me, but I noticed every one had a 3' x 4' board. That was the
> > > main reason I've never bought any of their games. I mentioned this fact here
> > > once before, last year I think. And I believe the only comment I received
> > > here was a flippant, "Hey, buy a bigger table!" Uh, no. I have no plans to
> > > change out furniture in my home because one game company makes their boards
> > > too big.
> >
> > Well, when me and my fiancee (now wife) bought a dining table for our
> > living room, I insisted on a big one suitable for boardgames with
> > several players.
>
> My wife & I do the same thing for a large game that we'd do for extra company: pop
> a leaf or two into the dining room table.
What about just playing on the floor?
-Doug
|
|