From: "Bull" <bull@goawayspamers.com>
Newsgroups: alt.games
References: <427f13ce$1@duster.adelaide.on.net> <427f14fc.9019668@news.pacificcoast.net>
Subject: Re: Can you suggest a board game?
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 18:14:37 +1000
Lines: 28
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp62-69.lns1.cbr1.internode.on.net
Message-ID: <427f1bfa$1@duster.adelaide.on.net>
X-Trace: duster.adelaide.on.net 1115626490 59.167.62.69 (9 May 2005 17:44:50 +0950)
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.games:1193
"Greg Aleknevicus" <greg@pacificcoast.net> wrote in message
news:427f14fc.9019668@news.pacificcoast.net...
> On Mon, 9 May 2005 17:39:58 +1000, "Bull" <bull@goawayspamers.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> > I am after a fairly simple board game. It needs to be a competative
> >two-player game, with both players moving at the same time (as per
> >rock/paper/sissors). Does anybody know of such a game?
>
> It would help if you described what you regard as "simple". What other
> games that you've played are of the same level of complexity as what
> you're looking for?
"Simple" in this case is anything from tic-tac-toe to chess. I need to
implement an artificial intelligence program that tries to pre-empt the
opponent's simultaneous moves.
> Games that I consider simple and feature simultaneous moves are:
> Quebec 1759
> Ace of Aces
Thanks for your suggestions. I will check them out.
|
|