Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "upallnite" <upallnite@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.funk-you
References: <1Uf1f.972$D8.234@okepread03> <pan.2005.10.06.21.42.26.302000@netscape.net>
Subject: <<pORN-aDDICT>> Reply to last message UAN --->
Lines: 20
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
Message-ID: <gek1f.984$D8.778@okepread03>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:32:08 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.249.4.208
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: okepread03 1128648716 24.249.4.208 (Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:31:56 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:31:56 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.funk-you:474
"Porn Addict"
>
Hey, Thanks for sharing...I appreciate all the effort and do want to try to
get as much of the SzeNt collection collected. It has been some time since
burning the first 1>22 CD's and I have had a lot to catch up on. I
apologize if any of my comments stirred up the "preferences topic" it
wasn't my intention. I seldom view male pictures and just found it
interesting that you would chose that NG to post; but there are so many,
especially a lot of obviously bogus ones, that it doesn't matter except as a
consideration of other NG users, which I too can appreciate which is why I
have used ABVP to do some extensive posts and had discovered the strippers
as being neglected also.
I haven't been a 'puter user as long as You seem to have been and don't
know anything before Win98. If I had to guess, I would say Scheherazade
came before Playgirls as a NG, it just sounds like it would've been a good
name for a porn NG. Was Playgirl published circa 94-95? that would be my
other possible clue to which came first... upallnite
|
|