Well, you're right...it didn't work. Part of the problem being that
only about 25 of the 80 pars made it thru, and the other part being
that your pars and the originals could not be combined, so that even
if all of your pars had made it, I would still have been short some 25
sections.
It's gonna be too much trouble for both of us to try to fix it, I
think. Accept my thanks again, and chalk it up to another unwanted
learning experience.
Fuzzy
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:28:48 +0100, "English Patient"
<england@not-on-your-nelly.com> wrote:
>
>it should be there by now (earlmiller that is)
>
>any missing bits can be reposted v.easily by yEncPP so just let me know
>
>EP.
>
>hubert q. fuzznuzz <fuzzy@fuzznuzz.ca> wrote:
>
>>Hey, I'm grateful for anything...earlmiller's fine...and many many
>>thanks just for thinking of this...
>>
>>fuzzy
>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:22:56 +0100, "English Patient"
>><england@not-on-your-nelly.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I've got 80blocks I could post, if I'm not stepping on anyones toes.
>>>Only it'd have to bve top another group, maybe the earlmiller one
>>>I've tried yEncPPosting to this group & for some reason it don't work
>>>But to the earlmiller one it works a treat.
>>>Up 2 U
>>>
>>>EP.
>>>
>>>
>>>hubert q. fuzznuzz <fuzzy@fuzznuzz.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>My server managed to drop about 45 parts of this file, and there
>>>>weren't anywhere near enough pars to make up the difference...is there
>>>>any chance of getting about 50 more..?
>>>>
>>>>It's a tall order, feel free to ignore it...
>>>>
>>>>fuzzy
|
|