On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:49:13 -0400, Doc NP-f31 wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:33:54 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
><victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>
>>Dear Cartoon,
>>
>>I've noted your first postings, the reaction to them from a few of our
>>patrons, and your own response to that. I think your reply was
>>unfortunate, but I understand, given how abruptly you were condemned
>>for your contribution.
>>
>>As everywhere, there are patrons who have strong preferences and
>>equally strong dislikes, some of which are so basic that, when they
>>are violated it requires an immediate and verbal assault. I am not a
>>hypocrite in that sense. Although I believe each poster should be
>>free to post what they prefer uncensored, there are ideas and images
>>that so outrage me that I would lash out at them as well. I love
>>naked boys and naughty play ... I am disturbed by images of boys being
>>physically hurt ... even if they have been staged. I utterly abhore
>>and condemn materials that portray the torture, death and cannibalism
>>of boys. I feel these are WRONG in every sense ... no matter how
>>primitive the graphic.
>>
>>But I also acknowledge that for every Boylover (however one might
>>define the term) there is a great range of what is viewed as "right"
>>and what is viewed as "wrong," what is to be embraced and what is to
>>be rejected. This we cannot change ... and we never will.
>>
>>That said, I'd like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed your subsequent
>>postings! You have obviously gone to great trouble to collect a
>>variety of artwork, and I found much of it new to me ... alluring,
>>thought provoking and well-executed. I particularly liked the line
>>drawings, and some of the rather outrageous work of Timofeev (I hope
>>I've got that right).
>>
>>I certainly hope you will continue.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Most Sincerely,
>>HMS Victor Victorian, Np-g18
>>God Save the Queen.
>>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>>God Preserve the Windsors.
>>Rule Britannia!
>
>Hi Double V,
>
>My comment when the original cartoons were posted was one of outrage
>and bitter disappointment. The attitude portrayed in the panels I saw
>were consistent with the stereotype the average person has about
>boylovers, portraying us as evil, manipulative and single minded. That
>is something I've been working against actively for over ten years. I
>am a boylover and I am the antithesis of the adults portrayed in those
>'comics'. I read 4s00th's response and I offer him a standing ovation.
>
>I had killfiltered the poster in question and didn't realize that he
>was still posting. Having read his response to my post, proves to me
>that I was right. I have not looked at the other postings you
>mentioned and I don't intend to. I re-plonked him.
>
>Love you though,
>
>Doc
>NP-f31
Dear Doc,
You must realise after having read my response to Nootrac and
explanation as I see it, that I was accurate in my assessment. I am
exceedingly sensitive about how Boylovers are portrayed, as are you,
but I seldom respond negatively to offering I find offensive. I
simply ignore them.
It is completely up to you as to whether you care to view any
subsequent offerings he may make. There are certain artists I treat
in the same manner.
Most Cordially,
V
God Save the Queen.
God Bless the Prince of Wales.
God Preserve the Windsors.
Rule Britannia!
|
|