Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:6583
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: Doc NP-f31
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: PING Nootrac
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:49:13 -0400
Message-ID: <48di599jlk678ocgnf94r6oeclfmag1itl@4ax.com>
References: <0i5g59tqdc2df1bse29r49n05o3o1ngbcd@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 64
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: f482afaf.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=MXCTGDe;o<OOObP71A_HVDL?0kYOcDh@Jb5k2ANBB_fISF8_SUETGcO;n^U31oXNSJ<ce<BCk>SDD12kPQ[cGDTL6Q:EFV7AKaFY9@N4eD\g9Kaf3dG_GbY1A
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:33:54 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
<victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>Dear Cartoon,
>
>I've noted your first postings, the reaction to them from a few of our
>patrons, and your own response to that. I think your reply was
>unfortunate, but I understand, given how abruptly you were condemned
>for your contribution.
>
>As everywhere, there are patrons who have strong preferences and
>equally strong dislikes, some of which are so basic that, when they
>are violated it requires an immediate and verbal assault. I am not a
>hypocrite in that sense. Although I believe each poster should be
>free to post what they prefer uncensored, there are ideas and images
>that so outrage me that I would lash out at them as well. I love
>naked boys and naughty play ... I am disturbed by images of boys being
>physically hurt ... even if they have been staged. I utterly abhore
>and condemn materials that portray the torture, death and cannibalism
>of boys. I feel these are WRONG in every sense ... no matter how
>primitive the graphic.
>
>But I also acknowledge that for every Boylover (however one might
>define the term) there is a great range of what is viewed as "right"
>and what is viewed as "wrong," what is to be embraced and what is to
>be rejected. This we cannot change ... and we never will.
>
>That said, I'd like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed your subsequent
>postings! You have obviously gone to great trouble to collect a
>variety of artwork, and I found much of it new to me ... alluring,
>thought provoking and well-executed. I particularly liked the line
>drawings, and some of the rather outrageous work of Timofeev (I hope
>I've got that right).
>
>I certainly hope you will continue.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Most Sincerely,
>HMS Victor Victorian, Np-g18
>God Save the Queen.
>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>God Preserve the Windsors.
>Rule Britannia!
Hi Double V,
My comment when the original cartoons were posted was one of outrage
and bitter disappointment. The attitude portrayed in the panels I saw
were consistent with the stereotype the average person has about
boylovers, portraying us as evil, manipulative and single minded. That
is something I've been working against actively for over ten years. I
am a boylover and I am the antithesis of the adults portrayed in those
'comics'. I read 4s00th's response and I offer him a standing ovation.
I had killfiltered the poster in question and didn't realize that he
was still posting. Having read his response to my post, proves to me
that I was right. I have not looked at the other postings you
mentioned and I don't intend to. I re-plonked him.
Love you though,
Doc
NP-f31
|
|