low priority.txt
A! there is a first time for everything arse wipe!
Here are a few corrections for you to try to take on board, considering
your limited grasp with reality!
At no time at any point have I suggested to fortsters to enrol to any
Karl commercial site.
This attribution exists purely within your clouded and warped grasp of
reality
I did state simply that not all his models are ugly Twinkies and backed
my statement up with posting a hard evidence rar file that even a brain
dead moron such as you could not refute?
and the rest of the fort could see this as fact for themselves.
I concluded agreement with you that Karl is a spammer but none the less
pointed out to you some of his post are on topic!
I Then Tried (foolishly) to elucidate to you the probable reasons why he
was spamming his sites across the entire Usenet.
He (Karl) is a robot BTW.
Ah! now George you are going to have to concentrate real hard and re-read
what I have to say, and try to comprehend the message I am trying my best
to get across to you, and anyone else with an interest in Boy love
newsgroups and picture collecting in general
The laws on what constitutes a pornographic picture or video of a minor
child has not altered very much in the last 10 years, nude pictures of a
minor child are not indecent under the law unless other factors make it
indecent ( sexual activity with another/ sexual excitement or
photographic concentration of the genitalia are the main features that
deem the material pornographic or indecent.
Let us examine say, Newstar jimmy photo collections, are these
pornographic, clearly under the law of pornography they are not .
The Law regarding legality and what is pornography has however been
neatly circumvented with the introduction of the criteria of "Reason and
likely intent of purpose" ( the wording summary changes across
countries.)
but the results are the same across the USA and Europe.
OK so what am I trying to get across?
Say for example, you have a stash of Wal-Mart catalogues, lots of them,
nothing illegal in owning Wal-Mart catalogues for sure!
Damn they are bulky buggers! so I tear off and just keep just the cute
boys in white shorts and underpants.
That's were the "Intent criteria" kicks in! Bang your busted for holding
Level 1 child porn.
They are deemed and become porn in law, if a jury is persuaded they are
being used for sexual gratification.
Pictures that are in all other respects legal, become porn if they are
used for pornographic or deviant purposes.
Its twisting the law, but then we are paedophiles so deserve shit,
that's the deal these days.
Now lets take for example Newstar, its a child model promotion site, and
sells access for payment, under the law it is reasonable for a model
agency specialising in kids to have pictures of them on their site, and
this allows them to (only just ) for now stay beyond the clutches of the
law (intent of purpose cannot be proved as it is a model promotion site,
and they do not fall foul of pornography law.
Get caught with a large stash of Jimmies on your hard drive and a garbage
can of Damp tissues and Bang your busted for downloading level 1 kiddy
porn
That's how it works I am sad to say.
One important factor With sites such as NEWSTAR is they are based in
Eastern Europe, If they were in the USA/Canada /UK they would be raided,
to obtain customer records.
Their customers would then be raided and busted under the same rules
regarding the Wal-Mart catalogues!
US law enforcement with a successful prosecution of US citizens
possession of pornography in the bag can then head strait back to
Newstar and BUST them on the grounds of Supply of Pornography,
even if under the law their photos and videos were not pornographic a US
prosecutor can now demonstrate they were being use widely for
pornographic purposes.
I strongly suspect That is exactly the scenario that was used for the
latest AZOV bust.
as I never saw or heard of any pornography emanating from them.
Rover, I can gladly and wholeheartedly agree on one of your
"pronouncements " only a complete fool would hand over their traceable
credit card details trusting them to Karl's site, ( there are ways to do
payments anonymously) I would extend that warning to any current legal
boy/girl picture sites as well, and maybe news providers of Usenet to be
on the safe side if you happen to be peeking in this group.
Over to you George! your turn :)
Cosmos
|
|