On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:47:18 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
<victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:02:30 +0100 (BST),
><Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA512
>>
>>HMS Victor Victorian wrote in alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy on Sunday 25 September
>>2011 11:43 in Message-ID: <bqiu771psq6ablch0b60q2isvqt3adrq4t@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Dear Baal,
>>>
>>> If my correspondent was indeed you, then you've misrepresented
>>> yourself by signing your name "C", a detail I had unfortunately
>>> overlooked earlier.
>>
>>Guess it wasn't me, then -- I've never signed any message with "C".
>>
>>I've since seen Cosmos say it was he who wrote you; it would appear that we
>>both did (at differing times), but you may not have received my message.
>>
>>I had written to you several weeks back, and I assumed it was my message
>>that you were referring to. Come to think of it, though, you may not have
>>received it, as I didn't get a response. (I'll send you another copy).
>>
>>For what it's worth, any email messages coming from me are PGP-clearsigned,
>>just like my Usenet posts. If the post's PGP signature doesn't verify as
>>valid, then the post isn't from me. My key is on the Hushmail keyservers, so
>>it is easy to verify whether the signature is genuine or not. As a matter of
>>fact, Hushmail's software will show that my signature(s) are valid when you
>>open the email. Hushmail will actually report:
>>
>>This message is encrypted, and is digitally signed by Baal_signing <Baal@hod.aarg.net>.
>>
>>Hod.aarg.net was the name of an earlier nymserver whose address is on my key;
>>why it displays that address, and not the current one, I have no idea.
>>
>>> Once again, you provide a wealth of information regarding the issue at
>>> hand ... and I appreciate your efforts on my behalf.
>>
>>You're most welcome. I think it's important for people to realize what
>>they're getting into; you have to understand the limits of the technology
>>that you're relying on to protect you. I'll post more on that later.
>>
>>> Most Sincerely Yours,
>>> V
>>> God Save the Queen.
>>> God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>>> God Preserve the Windsors.
>>> Rule Britannia!
>>
>>Baal <Baal@Usenet.org>
>>PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1E92C0E8
>>PGP Key Fingerprint: 40E4 E9BB D084 22D5 3DE9 66B8 08E3 638C 1E92 C0E8
>>Retired Lecturer, Encryption and Data Security, Pedo U, Usenet Campus
>
>Dear Baal,
>
>I have seen the same and report it is exactly as you represent, and I
>have written you regarding your latest.
>
>V
>God Save the Queen.
>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>God Preserve the Windsors.
>Rule Britannia!
Dear Baal,
My account indicates that the email to which I refer was indeed sent
to the addie you provide, and from which you wrote. I cannot explain
it other than there is a problem on your end.
Insomuch as my message was really of no importance, I will not resend
it.
My Best,
V
God Save the Queen.
God Bless the Prince of Wales.
God Preserve the Windsors.
Rule Britannia!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|