Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!s05-b44.iad!npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: Doc NP-f31
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: Doc is everyone's friend
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:27:12 -0400
Message-ID: <igga37p3a44af78i4nua6741spligs0v0i@4ax.com>
References: <76002b1e59e0ef3d76df385cb9294f6c@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 95
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59260767.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=:6g[e:J_DnN0UO2<>T]L;AL?0kYOcDh@JDj<GL_d2>[@BV[_EIl5[hO8WZUc:ZBMXO1UiUfab_h]ClJ>;5_j;DRBmg5m:jfbE_GnXA=I0`fO2JQ>D1I546BcB
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:4569
X-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:26:40 UTC (s05-b44.iad)
Hi Dave,
You certainly have a hard on for me, don't you? Or is it more of a
Magnificent Obsession?
You can hate on me all you want. But when Cosmos asked for some proof
of your accusations you came up with three pages of rhetoric. So
basically, anyone with a brain will know that you're talking shit.
We both stand for something. I believe in giving boys love and suport
in a nonsexual way. I believe that boys don't need a man's dick up
their ass. I believe that a sexual relationship is a piss poor
substitute for a meaningful non-sexual one and I believe that a sexual
relationship only benefits the man in 99% of cases. I have posted
supporting evidence over the years, you know that.
You believe in satsifying your urges with any boy who becomes
available (reference your paragraph three below). And you believe that
such a way of life is justified. How is it justified? You never
explain that part.
The truth is that my belief system makes yours look selfish and one
sided. Which is the truth of the matter, isn't it? And that makes you
look bad and it makes you feel bad about yourself.
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:22:13 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random
<anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
>Yes, he is a nice guy, will help you with your problems and with your
>manuscript, and so on and so forth, whatever. A real big Daddy!
>
>But he is especially friendly, dedicatedly friendly, self-denyingly,
>self immolatingly friendly to... boys!
I am curious to know why that would be bad thing in your opinion.
Because your comment is obviosuly derisive. Where is the sin in being
friendly to boys, even to a fault?
>He will do *anything* to protect boys, while at the same time helping
>you. He believes that it is better for your soul if you are in jail.
I would really like to see some proof for this claim. Good luck
digging those posts up.
>Certainly better for *his* boys! He believes it's win-win! Win for
>you because you are saved form yourselves. Good for himself because
>it makes him a messiah. And of course, and most immportantly, it is
>good for *his* boys!
>Doc imagines himself as "The Boys' Friend". He wants boys to see how
>dangerous you are to them. He wants to take your place with your
>boys. He wants to become *the* boys' lover! Exclusively! He doesn't
>want you to have access to them. He wants to have sole access to
>them. He hates it that you want to love with your bodies. He hates it
>that boys might love you with their bodies. He wants to get rid of
>the bodies out of boy love. He wants bodies to become disembodied
>images on the internet. He, he teaches, he himself, is the
>replacement for your bodies and the boys' bodies. They will not miss
>your love, they will not miss their physical expression of love for
>you, when they have HIM! When your bodies are out of the way in jail,
>they will have HIM! No competition for HIM! Nothing physical to keep
>boys from HIM! They will have is shining SOUL. HE loves them, that
>should satisfy them COMPLETELY!
>
>Yeah, well Doc. That's not only selfish, it's ugly. It's maiming!
It's fantasy.
I have no sympathy for your worldview and your subsequent
self-loathing induced hatred of those who take a different stand from
you. All BLs, including me, would love to have a loving and complete
relationship with a boy. A relationship completed in mutually
beneficial lovemaking. However, the VAST majority of boylovers
understand that this is not possible except in rare circumstances.Boys
are at a biological disadvantage, the hormones in their bodies push
them to seek sexual thrills. Taking advantage of that fact damages
lives. I know because I was one of those abused boys. I know because I
work with several abused boys regularly.
The damage is real and the healing takes a long time.
And let's be real. You've written to me seeking the list haven't you?
You know I'd never know because I send it out and that is it. Anyone
who has asked for it knows that. There is no follow up contact from me
unless they want to talk. But I have a lot of BL friends and some of
them are doing AMAZING things in the lives of their loved boys. In the
end, THAT is my victory over you. Me and my friends are making a
difference for boys, we are literally saving lives.
What is it that you are doing for them exactly?
Doc
NP-f31
|
|