On 30 Jul 2011 17:42:47 GMT, "\"C-0,Z*-M.o S+" <Ho@dat.com> wrote:
>Dave U. Random <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in
>news:61eddc9d9493f6b2a44bfb007640f28d@anonymitaet-im-inter.net:
>
>> Beware Doc. Already he has outed you with his posts here, branded
>> this group as a porn outlet,
>>
>> and helped destroy this group. Contact with Doc is the kiss of death.
>> He is a front. He constantly
>>
>> crawls the groups and sucks in the most vulnerable. He will always
>> suggest you contact him. He
>>
>> openly admits to looking at illegal stuff, he openly talks up making
>> porn available, yet over the 10+
>>
>> years that I have been aware of him he has lived a charmed life,
>> while many of those he "loved" in
>>
>> the groups have fallen around him! He encourages you to be in the
>> groups, he encourages you to
>>
>> post porn and to look at it, but says you should be good as dead
>> otherwise, and that is exactly
>>
>> what he wants to happen to you, and he will make it happen!
>>
>> Doc is untouchable and where he actually operates out of is
>> unknowable to us, all his "genuineness"
>>
>> and "proofs" notwithstanding. He is a grass.
>>
>>
>Hi Mr anonymous remailer Dave
>
>While I will uphold you're general warning to be careful when conversing
>and confiding with folks in these groups as a general precaution.
>
>Based on the premise of the reliable maxim, people are not always as they
>seem to be.
>Any trading directly or passing of personal information always carries a
>risk.
>
>There does seem to be certain conjecture and supposition in what you have
>said and I suspect not much of real substance or concrete evidence in
>your direct accusations concerning Doc.
>
>If you have evidence of your allegations then please post it for our
>benefit?
>Some of your statements I "know" are simply not true!
>
> (quote : the groups have fallen around him! He encourages you to be in
>the Groups, he encourages you to post porn and to look at it, but says
>you should be good as dead)
>
>This is not borne out by what I have seen Doc say within the groups?
>
>I have been in sporadic email contact over several years and have not had
>problems
>
>So I for one are sceptical of the substance of your warning concerning
>this specific individual
>
>Regards Cosmos
>
Dear Cosmos,
I agree with you completely and must add (understanding that the
following will be immediately discounted by those deluded in believing
I am actually Doc), that I have frequently corresponded with Doc for
better than two years via hush, and have never been asked to provide
personal information or materials of a dangerous nature.
Indeed, at my request, Doc has spent a considerable amount of time
meticulously reviewing and editing my latest manuscript, "Nigel and
the Facts of Life" and sharing some of his own works.
Trust is a scarce commodity in our community, particularly here in the
newsgroups and on the Internet in general, but as far as anyone could
be trusted ... I trust Doc far more than this ill-crafted assault on
his character.
Sincerely,
HMSVVNP-g18
|
|