I note that in another well-known and well-frequented group, now
dormant in regards to BL on-topic material, that spattering from a
seemingly endless spew going on in ASBL have repeated splashed onto
the walls and floor of the place ... actually much like this place
used to be before TnA renovated [tho' occasionally one detects a
slight hint, just a slight hint, of malodorous residue]. Going there
is very much like walking the streets Medievel London. One had to
watch where one stepped below and where one walked above, that one
should find one's fine feathered hat suddenly soaked with the
contents of a chamber pot.
Ah, yes. I miss those good old days, don't you?
Ted seems to have launched some kind of social programme to reform, or
at the very least warm. I wish him the best of luck with that
Quixotic quest. It seems a troll named Ann wants to criminalize the
nude photography of children, believing it sets off an irresistable
need in the paedophiles' to go out and grab some young child and "have
their way with him/her/it."
First, why stop with nude photos? Why not outlaw anything that could
be seen as suggestive--the famous Calvin Kline underwear row comes to
mind--we could include anything that shows skin above the knees or
below the neckline. Yes, it is true that little boy nipples and
little girl nipples look the same--oh dear! How then can we
differentiate without outlawing all nipples! Let it be done, I say!
We wouldn't want to run the risk of setting off those raging hormones!
Absolutely preposterous.
Secondly, the very idea that paedophiles are incapable of controlling
their emotions and urges is complete bullocks. [Oops, sorry] The
community of boylovers is quite similar to the community of
heterosexuals. Most boylovers admire from afar ... as do
heterosexuals ... and perhaps like looking at pictures. Would either
a boylover or a woman lover, if the opportunity presented itself for
some "touching" or "close hugging" not take that opportunity? Well,
some would and some would not. A boylover, like a woman lover, might
very well want to get close to an attractive acquaintance ... to kiss,
or touch, or fondle, or hug or grope, have quick sex, go to bed, live
together for years and years, etc. Because this behavior is expected
among woman lovers, it occurs often. Although it does happen with
boylovers, it is less frequent for obvious reasons. But all in all,
the vast majority of boylovers either avoid the relationship or keep
it superficial. Heterosexuals, particularly heterosexual men who are
known to see the sexual act as a peculiar combination of love,
violence and domination, have demonstrated a propensity to do real
violence to women--rape, torture and even murder. Concurrently, there
is tiny number of boylovers who have the same murderous
propensities. "Woman lovers" who commit these kinds of heinous acts
are not lovers of women at all, but sadists. Men who claim themselves
"boylovers" yet commit these kinds of horrible deeds are not lovers of
boys at all, either. Fortunately, this kind of cruel individual is in
the extreme minority in both populations, though I think a
statistical comparison of the two might reflect better on the
"paedophiles" than on the "heterosexuals".
Hence, I dismiss the argument as entirely ludicrous.
Now, I think I shall do some posting of pictures for a friend, who
expressed some amazement that there are contemporary Flying Boy photos
... but just a little bit. I shouldn't wish to excite ... causing
you all dear patrons to rush to the nearest park and ...
Well, you understand, I'm sure.
VV
God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
Rule Britannia!
|
|