On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:22:09 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
<victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:30:02 -0400, NP-f31 wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:57:39 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
>><victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>To wit:
>>>
>>>One reflects that much horror is done in the world for the good of
>>>some exhaulted cause ... but I say
>>>It is the essence of Evil.
>>>That there are many Bad people in this world,
>>>Who don the mantle of Good.
>>>
>>>For all the evil in the world is done by Good men.
>>>
>>>VV
>>
>>What a beautiful, beautiful boy. And related to your young princes
>>today. One can see the family resemblance. I wish I could have saved
>>him....He would have had a rough time of it anyway with his
>>hemophilia.
>>
>>Thanks for the beauty,
>>
>>Doc
>>NP-f31
>
>Dear Doc,
>
>It is always a great pleasure to hear from you.
>If I may, I should like to propose that you pose yet
>Another question for discussion.
>
>Much has been said regarding today's stricte sexual prohibitions
>regarding sexual activity between adults and children. Right or
>wrong, good or bad, it must be admitted that these prohibitions will
>remain, as will remain the consequences for those adults and
>youngsters who engage in such activity--right or wrong, good or bad.
>It has been said that a true Boylover would not risk exposing his
>young friend to such negative consequences by seducing him ... rather
>to admire him from "afar" as to actually engage with him.
>During the discussion about the actions of the nurse, this aspect of
>the problem hovered above the discourse, but was never directly
>addressed ... not to be morbid ... but perhaps because the assumption
>that the boy would soon die precluded any concern over any long term
>ramifications of the act.
>Pray tell, what say ye?
>
>V
>
>God Save the Queen.
>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>God Preserve the Windsors.
>Rule Britannia!
Hey Double V,
Thanks for the challenging question. I understand the need to protect
children from rape and molestation. It happens and it is an
abomination. Those who do such things should be punished severely.
There is a difference though between rape, molestation and children
who willingly and willfully engage in sexual acts with adults and
older children.
Much of western society (and Australian) go insane with the thought of
children and sex in the same sentence. Many of the laws you're
referring to are reactionary and the penalities are WAAAAAY out of
line in comparison to the acts being prosecuted. They don't take into
account the natural sexuality and sexual curiosity of children. You
and I (and Zackie) know that a 13 year old adolescent boy will stick
his penis into anything. They are sexual opportunists. They have a
natural curiosity and a biological imperative to spread their seed.
How can you legislate against nature? It won't work. Boys will have
sex with men or older boys, it's going to happen. 9 out of every 10
adolescent boys will have some sort of homosexual experience (Masters
and Johnson, 1966). In my opinion that 10th boy is either lying or
molesting farm animals. So what happens if peers are caught? In some
cases they can both be prosecuted as adults and be considered sex
offenders. If there is even a slight age mismatch the older partner
will be prosecuted. Obviously any man that touches a child will be
punished severely. It demonizes sex, it ruins lives, it makes man/boy
sex taboo and as a result even more desirable in some cases.
No one wins, everyone loses and no one is protected. The laws make no
sense. Forcible rape and unwanted touching should be prosecuted
severely. Blatant seduction should be prosecuted to a lesser extent,
but still severely. Mutually consensual sex between peers or near
peers should be decriminalized. Loving man/boy sexual relationships? A
policy should be established where a boy can seek permission to engage
in lovemaking with an adult partner with parental/guardian permission.
For example, there have been many cases in which a man was prosecuted
even when the boy and his family didn't want to press charges. Who
wins in that scenario? Those type of convictions should be banned.
No law will be perfect, but the current laws are insane. Protections
are needed, but extreme punishments of the type that are currently
sought go too far.
It's not a perfect world. There will be no perfect solutions.
Great topic. We can save the concept of emotional damage to a child
for next time.
Doc
NP-f31
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|