Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b30!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe04.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dude With the Hair <DudeWiththe(REMOVE)Hair@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Message-ID: <2k1683pmt89asncgj10mgv3oefv08839ia@4ax.com>
References: <myaddress-2FD609.21114316062007@news.easynews.com> <4nl083p4hhstv7dlobtmdhr1kfa904ci6n@4ax.com> <84u083dpdp55ts39tgbac21q1q69qjg3fe@4ax.com> <a5e383dkld3d9r8dgkhctlmiblao1o1dkd@4ax.com> <t9j383h4c7knmv2rdiirbsje6392975400@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 86
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:02:35 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:164
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:08:45 UTC (s02-b30)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:49:40 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
<VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:33:59 GMT, Dude With the Hair
><DudeWiththe(REMOVE)Hair@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:34:57 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
>><VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
>>
>>*Saving bandwidth*
>>
>>>>As for guidelines for intergenerational relationships, I can distill
>>>>the right path down to one simple mantra:
>>>>
>>>>If we put our boys first in all things, then we will succeed in all of
>>>>our goals for them.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again The Non, for the thoughtful informative post.
>>>>
>>>>Doc
>>>>NP-f31
>>>>
>>>>Boys First, Last and Always
>>>
>>>Taking your mantra to a logical extension ...
>>>
>>>Given the nature of Western Judeo-Christian society, a boylover who
>>>has a consensual intimate relations with a young friend, however that
>>>might be expressed, harms the boy through his own irresponsibility,
>>>knowing that if the relationship is exposed, the boy could be
>>>stigmatized by the very society that claims to protect his interests.
>>>
>>>This, then, is 4s00th's position.
>>>
>>>Is it yours?
>>>Is it The Non's?
>>
>>In my practice and world view that scenario will have been thoroughly
>>disscussed, debated and decided upon by both parties before any
>>consenual act ever takes place. Given your example, you can see why I
>>believe intergenerational sexual relationships should only be acted
>>upon after months of eduation, thought and heartfelt discussion
>>between partners who condider each other equals.
>>
>>Doc
>>NP-f31
>>
>>>Most respectfully,
>>>VV
>>>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>>>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>>>Rule Britannia!
>
>
>Yet, you must concede, my dear friend, that although a man and a boy
>may have serious discussions regarding intimacy, and that the boy may
>eagerly desire such intimacy, there is a real danger that should the
>relationship "come out" in public, the boy will be stigmatized,
>perhaps feel humiliation and suffer degredation--in other words, be
>harmed.
>
>Let me tell you a story. I know of a boy, who was "involved" with a
>man much older than he. Once an investigation was completed, the
>older man went to prison for twenty years. The boy at the time of the
>man's arrest was twelve or thirteen years old. By the time the trial
>ended and the whole scenario became public, he was just entering
>secondary.
>
>One morning, a passerby found him in a deep ravine, upon the rocks
>below a highway bridge, dead. He had thrown himself off in an
>attempt, tragically successful, to commit suicide. It was explained
>to me that he had been so unmercifully taunted and degraded by his
>school mates for being "so-and-so's wife" etc. that he had been driven
>to self destruction.
>
>Is this outcome substantially the fault, then, of the man who loved
>the boy and got caught?
>
>Respectfully submitted.
No, that outcome was the results of kids being tough on other kids.
And the real blame lies on the media who would publish the name of a
minor in such a case. That should never have happened.
Doc
NP-f31
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|