| |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| the non (myaddress@server.co) |
2007/06/27 12:19 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b42!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe06.news.easynews.com.POSTED!myaddress
From: the non <myaddress@server.co>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
References: <myaddress-2FD609.21114316062007@news.easynews.com> <4nl083p4hhstv7dlobtmdhr1kfa904ci6n@4ax.com> <84u083dpdp55ts39tgbac21q1q69qjg3fe@4ax.com> <myaddress-4F1F13.12210226062007@news.easynews.com> <63q283lcqt2d2k1vj21m5n4tp7il8ktmgq@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Message-ID: <myaddress-5B31B1.20185727062007@news.easynews.com>
Lines: 66
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:19:12 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:162
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:35:42 UTC (s02-b42)
snip
>
> Thanks for your contribution. I believe you have side stepped the
> intent of my question.
>
> Knowing the attitude of Western society regarding boylove and the
> potential harm that may come to the boy from that attitude, does a
> boylover then injure the child by the very act of initmatacy?
>
> Certainly the guardians of social morality and mental health would
> answer resoundingly, "Yes!"
>
> What then say you?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
> "That which is not just is not law"
Since you ask, no. The guardians of social morality and mental health
do far more damage than any paedophile short of kidnap and aggravated
rape, and people who do that aren't paedophiles, they are kidnappers and
rapists.
Since you are fond stories, let me tell a couple:
(1) a personal friend used to befriend runaways and homeless boys in a
major West Coast city. He would feed them, clothe them as necessary,
take care of medical and dental problems, and after several months (the
boys knowing all the time my friend's underlying orientation) they might
pose for his camera, if they were so inclined. No pressure. Some of
the even wanted to sleep with him (heavens to Murgatroid!). One of "his
boys", 14 then and now 18, was caught having sex with another 14yo
street kid, and the police threatened him with a rape charge unless the
gave up the name(s) of adult(s) with whom he had had sex. So the 18
year old named my friend, who was promptly arrested, eventually
convicted (of photographing minors) and sentenced to 10 years. The cops
filed Rape against the 18 year old anyway, and he jumped off a high
bridge. Who harmed whom?
(2) Another pair of friends, who had no sexual contact until after age
18 (and then token experimentation), had a similar result. The man was
charged (and convicted) of possession of illegal porn, sentenced to 10
years. His friend, whom the police got wind of, was fragile, tended to
be depressive, and the police tried everything in their copybook to try
and get him to implicate the older friend in an illegal sex act (i.e.
under age). He couldn't because it didn't happen, and he wouldn't
fabricate. But the result of FBI "intensive interview" techniques were
so thoroughly devastating and demoralizin, destroying his self-esteem,
that he casually stepped out of a 16th story window after it was over.
So re-read what I wrote, and understand that individuals have different
capabilities of understanding and perspective. Some people cannot have
a sexual relationship at age 25 (or even any age) without guilt, remorse
and emotional damage, while some (not any, not all, but some) boys can
place the experience in context at age twelve or younger. Follow
science, not the crackpot whims of your "guardians" and your mental
health professions, most of whom need intensive mental health therapy
themselves before they should ever think of addressing the problems of
others.
Finally, please remember that "morality" is based upon tribal beliefs
and superstitions; it is not universal but reflective of whatever group
of nuts you happen to chose to belong to. Ethics, on the other hand, is
based upon kindness and fair play, and is universally applicable.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
|