Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b03!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe05.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VV@19thCent.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Organization: Her Majesty's Service
Reply-To: PrinceAlbert@RuleBritannia
Message-ID: <t9j383h4c7knmv2rdiirbsje6392975400@4ax.com>
References: <myaddress-2FD609.21114316062007@news.easynews.com> <4nl083p4hhstv7dlobtmdhr1kfa904ci6n@4ax.com> <84u083dpdp55ts39tgbac21q1q69qjg3fe@4ax.com> <a5e383dkld3d9r8dgkhctlmiblao1o1dkd@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 76
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:49:40 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:161
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:06:23 UTC (s02-b03)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:33:59 GMT, Dude With the Hair
<DudeWiththe(REMOVE)Hair@hushmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:34:57 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
><VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
>
>*Saving bandwidth*
>
>>>As for guidelines for intergenerational relationships, I can distill
>>>the right path down to one simple mantra:
>>>
>>>If we put our boys first in all things, then we will succeed in all of
>>>our goals for them.
>>>
>>>Thanks again The Non, for the thoughtful informative post.
>>>
>>>Doc
>>>NP-f31
>>>
>>>Boys First, Last and Always
>>
>>Taking your mantra to a logical extension ...
>>
>>Given the nature of Western Judeo-Christian society, a boylover who
>>has a consensual intimate relations with a young friend, however that
>>might be expressed, harms the boy through his own irresponsibility,
>>knowing that if the relationship is exposed, the boy could be
>>stigmatized by the very society that claims to protect his interests.
>>
>>This, then, is 4s00th's position.
>>
>>Is it yours?
>>Is it The Non's?
>
>In my practice and world view that scenario will have been thoroughly
>disscussed, debated and decided upon by both parties before any
>consenual act ever takes place. Given your example, you can see why I
>believe intergenerational sexual relationships should only be acted
>upon after months of eduation, thought and heartfelt discussion
>between partners who condider each other equals.
>
>Doc
>NP-f31
>
>>Most respectfully,
>>VV
>>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>>Rule Britannia!
Yet, you must concede, my dear friend, that although a man and a boy
may have serious discussions regarding intimacy, and that the boy may
eagerly desire such intimacy, there is a real danger that should the
relationship "come out" in public, the boy will be stigmatized,
perhaps feel humiliation and suffer degredation--in other words, be
harmed.
Let me tell you a story. I know of a boy, who was "involved" with a
man much older than he. Once an investigation was completed, the
older man went to prison for twenty years. The boy at the time of the
man's arrest was twelve or thirteen years old. By the time the trial
ended and the whole scenario became public, he was just entering
secondary.
One morning, a passerby found him in a deep ravine, upon the rocks
below a highway bridge, dead. He had thrown himself off in an
attempt, tragically successful, to commit suicide. It was explained
to me that he had been so unmercifully taunted and degraded by his
school mates for being "so-and-so's wife" etc. that he had been driven
to self destruction.
Is this outcome substantially the fault, then, of the man who loved
the boy and got caught?
Respectfully submitted.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|