On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:34:57 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
<VV@19thCent.net> wrote:
*Saving bandwidth*
>>As for guidelines for intergenerational relationships, I can distill
>>the right path down to one simple mantra:
>>
>>If we put our boys first in all things, then we will succeed in all of
>>our goals for them.
>>
>>Thanks again The Non, for the thoughtful informative post.
>>
>>Doc
>>NP-f31
>>
>>Boys First, Last and Always
>
>Taking your mantra to a logical extension ...
>
>Given the nature of Western Judeo-Christian society, a boylover who
>has a consensual intimate relations with a young friend, however that
>might be expressed, harms the boy through his own irresponsibility,
>knowing that if the relationship is exposed, the boy could be
>stigmatized by the very society that claims to protect his interests.
>
>This, then, is 4s00th's position.
>
>Is it yours?
>Is it The Non's?
In my practice and world view that scenario will have been thoroughly
disscussed, debated and decided upon by both parties before any
consenual act ever takes place. Given your example, you can see why I
believe intergenerational sexual relationships should only be acted
upon after months of eduation, thought and heartfelt discussion
between partners who condider each other equals.
Doc
NP-f31
>Most respectfully,
>VV
>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>Rule Britannia!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|