On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:50:27 +0000 (UTC), ThePsyko
<thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
>On 23 May 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.support.boy-lovers and
>heard cry out in news:g1629u$gi7$1@news.mixmin.net...
>
>> Whenever cornered on an actual point, such as any one of the myriad
>> contradictions in the unyielding wall of antipedo discourse, they
>> always just ignore it and attack on another front. Children can give
>> informed consent to something? Of course they can, they are expected
>> to on all sorts of serious matters, such as whether to risk life and
>> limb playing extremely dangerous full contact sports (Ted could tell
>> us about the lifelong injuries sustained by playing Australian
>> football, for example, but gridiron and rugby are probably almost as
>> bad). Then there's skateboards and climbing trees. More children
>> are crippled or killed every year through those activities (not to
>> mention psychological trauma of hospitalization and rehab) than anyone
>> would dare acknowledge. There is extreme social pressure for boys to
>> play dangerous sports, much iof it from those who are supposed to
>> protect them. But they give their consent to play, usually enjoy it
>> too.
>>
>> Are we sure they understand the risks of dangerous sports? No, but we
>> really don't care. We feel the benefits of team sports outweigh the
>> risks, though they really do not in many cases.
>>
>> Do we understand the alleged risks of children being photographed
>> naked? What risks? Oh, that's right, YOU might make them feel
>> ashamed, for what, having bodies? And then there's the catchall
>> (another hallmark) 'they're being exploited!". I know it is a waste of
>> time typing anything in response to these bastards, because they are
>> not interested (or even capabale) of examining the actual basis of
>> their own position. They just believe they are right. As I said, when
>> cornered, they just deflect and come in on another line of attack. It
>> is extremely threatening to them, to the core, to even contemplate
>> that they might be wrong on any of their doctrinaire bollocks. I have
>> experienced this also in trying to discuss the whole antipedo paranoid
>> pogrom with ordinary folk out there in the world.. Even if
>> intellectually they know I am right on these points, the programming
>> goes so deep that at some point they just can't take it, and we're
>> back to no grey areas. Black and white.
>>
>> Yet we are the ones who are supposed to be mired in "cognitive
>> distortion" (what they say you are doing when you disagree with them)
>> and "a wall of defences". The shoe fits just as well on the other
>> foot.
>>
>> You're all body-hating, ideologically driven, bastards. Get fucked
>> the lot of you.
>>
>>
>
>wah... you aren't allowed to slake your lust at the expense of societies
>children.
>
>sucks to be you.
Please remember to use the possessive form correctly. It will make
you appear more intelligent than I suspect you truly are.
My regards,
Victor
God Save the Queen!
God Preserve the Prince of Wales!
Rule Britannia!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|