On 23 May 2008 I stormed the castle called alt.support.boy-lovers and
heard cry out in news:g1629u$gi7$1@news.mixmin.net...
> Whenever cornered on an actual point, such as any one of the myriad
> contradictions in the unyielding wall of antipedo discourse, they
> always just ignore it and attack on another front. Children can give
> informed consent to something? Of course they can, they are expected
> to on all sorts of serious matters, such as whether to risk life and
> limb playing extremely dangerous full contact sports (Ted could tell
> us about the lifelong injuries sustained by playing Australian
> football, for example, but gridiron and rugby are probably almost as
> bad). Then there's skateboards and climbing trees. More children
> are crippled or killed every year through those activities (not to
> mention psychological trauma of hospitalization and rehab) than anyone
> would dare acknowledge. There is extreme social pressure for boys to
> play dangerous sports, much iof it from those who are supposed to
> protect them. But they give their consent to play, usually enjoy it
> too.
>
> Are we sure they understand the risks of dangerous sports? No, but we
> really don't care. We feel the benefits of team sports outweigh the
> risks, though they really do not in many cases.
>
> Do we understand the alleged risks of children being photographed
> naked? What risks? Oh, that's right, YOU might make them feel
> ashamed, for what, having bodies? And then there's the catchall
> (another hallmark) 'they're being exploited!". I know it is a waste of
> time typing anything in response to these bastards, because they are
> not interested (or even capabale) of examining the actual basis of
> their own position. They just believe they are right. As I said, when
> cornered, they just deflect and come in on another line of attack. It
> is extremely threatening to them, to the core, to even contemplate
> that they might be wrong on any of their doctrinaire bollocks. I have
> experienced this also in trying to discuss the whole antipedo paranoid
> pogrom with ordinary folk out there in the world.. Even if
> intellectually they know I am right on these points, the programming
> goes so deep that at some point they just can't take it, and we're
> back to no grey areas. Black and white.
>
> Yet we are the ones who are supposed to be mired in "cognitive
> distortion" (what they say you are doing when you disagree with them)
> and "a wall of defences". The shoe fits just as well on the other
> foot.
>
> You're all body-hating, ideologically driven, bastards. Get fucked
> the lot of you.
>
>
wah... you aren't allowed to slake your lust at the expense of societies
children.
sucks to be you.
--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
**Pissing off the planet, one person at a time**
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|