Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmnpeer01.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!txtfeed2.tudelft.nl!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe04.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorian@NBG.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: The Persecution Delusion
Message-ID: <21p3341saohs9r299epopjg7u6qtog5vph@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 82
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 21:07:58 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1529
X-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:08:09 MST (textbe01-phx)
Are Boylovers deluded into believing their are persecuted? If so, and
if it can ever be demonstrated that persecution is justifiable, is
such persecution justified?
The premise of the Persecution Delusion camp is that Boylovers seek
acceptance for loving boys from other historically-persecuted groups,
all of whom certain individuals of the American colour would claim are
no longer persecuted, that Boylovers depend on the acceptance of these
groups as a cover to "allow them to have sex with children."
That is a patent lie. Boylovers require no such support from anyone,
and the social climate is such that no support would be given.
Mainstream gay organizations have disavowed any support of Boylove
organisations--not so much because they are categorically opposed to
young relationships, but to protect themselves lend legitimacy to
their own agenda by embracing a popular issue in the general society.
Again, given the present social climate in Anglo-Protestant societies,
this is completely understandable. I do not condemn them.
Persecution is defined as the condition of being harassed or annoyed,
to insure, grieve or afflict with intent to cause harm based on a
belief or beliefs, so with reflection it is very clear that Boylovers
are persecuted. Some would say, yes, they are but for justifiable
reasons. Usually these reasons hinge on citation of heinous acts by a
very small number of individuals who are labeled Boylovers by the
persecutors.
But aside from that observation, which has been statistically show to
be accurate, in terms of wreaking abuse, I would gladly compare the
population of Boylovers to any American population of male
heterosexuals. You will find the incidences of violence and abuse
towards both women and children far higher in the heterosexual male
population across the boards than among a similar population of
Boylovers.
I regret that I cannot produce this equitable population of Boylovers,
for they shall not step forward in order to be identified, and I do
not blame them. Why could this possibly be? Again, society so
stigmatises Boylove that all Boylovers understand their well-being,
physical, financial, domestic and mental, would be severely
compromised if their preferences were made know. Contrary to
evidence, popular society clings (yes, even perhaps bitterly) to their
belief that merely being sexually attracted to boys constitutes a real
danger to children. Yet they are shunned, badgered, harassed, their
property destroyed and even physically assaulted when their desires
are simply suspected. They are "a danger to the children."
There is no persuasive evidence for this position. The overwhelming
majority of Boylovers fantasize, but never pursue the object of their
desires, for a variety of reasons. Of those who have had emotional
and sexual relationships with boys, the overwhelming number of them
would never do anything to truly hurt their little friends. I think
you will find comparable numbers among the heterosexual population,
but probably not as laudable.
Additionally, anyone who might appear to voice understanding or
sympathy for the Boylover is equally hazardous. They run a real risk
of being labeled by "society" as "paedophile enablers." Even the
debate about Boylove and paedophilia has been suppressed by
Judeo-Christian value-based NGOs, such as the Internet Watch
Foundation.
So, there will not be a statistically viable, comprehensive study
simply because, in this time of hysteria, Boylovers will remain
anonymous.
I completely encourage them to do so, as I do, for however you wish to
window-dress it, it is persecution of the most odious kind.
HMS Victor Victorian, NP-g18
God Save the Queen!
God Preserve the Prince of Wales!
Rule Britannia!
|
|