"Homoaner" <homoaner@home.hut> wrote in news:482f3e96$0$26197
$882e0bbb@news.ThunderNews.com:
>
> On 2-May-2008, HMS Victor Victorian@NBG.net wrote:
>
>>
>> "These lists are not accessible to members of the public."
>
> This is exactly why, in the name of the freedom of speech of ALL people of
> the world, usenet needs a quick, very brief, shocking flood of pictures of
> nude children photoshopped (not very neatly or carefully, I think ) into
> on-topic picutres for all the picture groups.
>
> I wonder, can someone "batch process" the pasting of a neatly cropped naked
> boy into 1000s different of pictures at once?
>
> Perhaps one of the nudist films could have a news-crawl-styled announcement
> pasted on the bottom telling all users of usenet what IWF is doing and
> explain to them that if our groups are threatened, then so are theirs.
>
> Someone at IWF might decide that all people who enjoy pictures of toy
> poodles are suddenly pedophiles because they found a few photoshopped
> pictures of toy poodles with naked boys in them, or vice versa.
>
You idiots sure are worked up about people hating you.What did you expect?
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
|