On Tue, 06 May 2008 19:02:59 -0500, orion9@yahoo.com
<orion9@yahoo.com@*** SUNSHINE ***> wrote:
>Angel-boys.com was not from him!
>
>Angel-boys.com was from russia!
>
>but anyway, it is fakt, thats make face on foto....it is thebigest error!
>and not think he real abouse the children, the boys are hucker...think they work in this job today too.
>think chance this, than must help the children direkt, before he must work as hucker!
>thats the biggest error in all law doing in any country.
>
>not make money with people in indusry (childworker in china/asia)
>it is the kapitalism system this make thats children must work as hooker,
>also not cry anyone make fotos of this shit!
>
>i not understand realy interpol aktion, better give the money for this action to help children as make this big shit.
>
>HELP BEFORE! NOT LATER THIS SHIT!
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
>----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
Yes, quite. I nevertheless maintain that the majority of the images
found at that web site, as well as several collections from BHP, were
photographed by the same individual now named as the suspect, who is
pictured against the same background as shown in many of those photo
sessions.
Of all the pictures I have seen, probably five hundred across
collections, none remotely document abuse unless one believes the very
state of nudity is abuse. Although I doubt not that illegal images
exist, I have yet to see one. Interpol would have one believe that
there are 800 or more pornographic pictures of these boys, all of
which document some type of sexual maltreatment. I doubt that very
seriously, but I suppose dissemination of misinformation for a
righteous cause can be excused, even for law enforcement.
In the pictures I have seen, the young lads seems to be having a
smashing good time.
Abuse. No doubt.
Sincerely,
VV
God Save the Queen!
God Preserve the Prince of Wales!
Rule Britannia!
|
|