Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b64!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!news.highwinds-media.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe03.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HMS Victor Victorian <VictorVictorian@NBG.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: A Caveat of Their Own
Message-ID: <0jru141eu3trqv5djto25d6638q7emj901@4ax.com>
References: <tvpu14lpmba9fsk7ac98cg0d33h5k1ohgu@4ax.com> <52ru14t9d7jrro2sdmbuacsdetv5ni3nes@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 20:31:01 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:1475
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:43:30 UTC (s02-b64)
On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:21:46 GMT, Moi <Moi@Moi.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 05 May 2008 20:14:04 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
><VictorVictorian@NBG.com> wrote:
>
>>Note that the IWF considers the term "pornography" as having a
>>somewhat legitimising effect, so they kindly request you all to refer
>>to images rather as "PRCBSA" (rather cumbersome, certainly, but please
>>see below).
>>
>>"Please note that "child pornography", "child porn" or "kiddie porn"
>>are not acceptable terms. The use of such language acts to legitimise
>>images which are not pornography, rather, they are permanent records
>>of children being sexually abused and as such should be referred to as
>>child sexual abuse images."
>>
>>The IWF's determination of what types of images constitute PRCBSA is a
>>very wide one, indeed, if one considers the number of types of groups
>>suddenly esponged from various news service providers. Is a picture
>>of a nude boy standing, casting a fishing line out on a lake shore, a
>>PRCBSA? If not, does it become a PRCBSA if one crops the image to
>>centre the viewers line of sight with the lad's genitals? If the boy
>>smiling or laughing, is he still being abused?
>>
>>Well, fear not. To paraphrase a rather succinct American judge, your
>>heroes at IWF "know it when they see it--and you should, too!"
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Victor
>
>email me if you still have my email addy
>Cheers
>Moi
Heavens!
I thought was utterly alone in here.
Where were you hiding, Moi?
Behind the divan?
No, I don't have your addie, but you have mine.
Please contact me.
VV
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|