Uzytkownik "zbihniew" <zbihniew@op.pl> napisal w wiadomosci
news:bgg9js.2do.1@zbihniew.news...
> Bernhard van Velsen wrote:
<snip>
>
> I guess many people here don't speak Esperanto. English is the language
> of this group. You should use Esperanto in alt.esperanto.* hierarchy.
> There's a guy writing Interlingua: ok, it's comprehendable but he only
> makes trouble :))
>
Daj spokoj. Kazdy powinien czuc sie swobodny uzyc wsrod wspol-lingwistow
dowolny jezyk. Jezeli nie moze byc bigos babylonski tu, to gdzie?
That having been said I find it hard to believe only a minority of people
interested in artificial languages would speak Esperanto.
I wonder if we could take a straw poll, who speaks and who doesn't speak
Esperanto out of the ala regulars?
Mark your Esperanto on a scale of 1-10? (Mine's about a 6)
> btw, I've never seen this way to write Esperanto diactric. I think the
> most popular is with 'x' albeit they teach in Poland using '^' (eg. c^u)
>
Zamenhof himself suggested the convention that Bernhard uses, but I myself
prefer x-metodo, which is more elegant.
On soc.culture.esperanto, which is the leading esperanto-language group,
opinion seems to be split with at least a third trying to use Unicode to get
to cxapel-metodo, the rest fairly evenly split between x-metodo and
h-metodo.
Onklo Dacxjo
|
|