| Re: Davey, a question |
Tadex Niejadex |
| Piorokrat (piorokrat@autograf.pl) |
2003/08/01 08:13 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Davey, a question
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:13:42 +0200
Organization: Tadex Niejadex
Lines: 233
Sender: piorokrat@autograf.pl@wb217.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <bgdsjq$fe6$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <bcrl1r01b89@drn.newsguy.com> <bg60ap$md8$1@panix5.panix.com> <d8119f70.0307291032.5abb1813@posting.google.com> <bg864g$dt3$1@news.onet.pl> <bg8jm3$a11$1@panix2.panix.com> <bg9cj1$h6f$1@news.onet.pl> <bfaf9f.0307310949.22ee4bb4@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wb217.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1059747258 15814 80.50.147.217 (1 Aug 2003 14:14:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onet.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Aug 2003 14:14:18 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:89
Uzytkownik "Crash Street Kidd" <crashstreetkidd@hotmail.com> napisal w
wiadomosci news:bfaf9f.0307310949.22ee4bb4@posting.google.com...
> "Piorokrat" <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote in message
news:<bg9cj1$h6f$1@news.onet.pl>...
>
> Had to use google if I am going to crosspost to your
> newsgroup...
Thank you for taking the trouble.
> > news:bg8jm3$a11$1@panix2.panix.com...
> > > In article <bg864g$dt3$1@news.onet.pl>,
> > > Piorokrat <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Uzytkownik "Canader Canader" <canaduher@beer.com> napisal w
wiadomosci
> > > >news:d8119f70.0307291032.5abb1813@posting.google.com...
> > > >> allisson@panix.com (Allisson) wrote in message
> > news:<bg60ap$md8$1@panix5.panix.com>...
> > > >> > In article <b9b3de8.0307290321.18c5e802@posting.google.com>,
> > > >> > David writes as Jerzy Jakubowski <branchofjesse@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [snip]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Davey on Mike:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> >> Naah. Don't call it. Just chase it. You're a lawyer, don't
> > forget.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And you were going to leave and *never* post again, or was that
> > > >> > only under your real name and prexisting socs?
> > > >
> > > >Your boyfriend lawyer axed me a question.
> > >
> > > And you were going to *never* post again -- which pretty much
> > > read as a great big grandstanding statement, but I digress --
> > > actually, I though you were going to leave Usenet all together,
> > > or so you implied.
> >
> > I said I might use my group, and I did use it because it seemed
ungracious
> > to those who were so kind as to feel I deserved to have one, just to
ignore
> > it.
> >
> > Had Mickey not written a question, I would not have put in an
appearance.
> >
> > Maybe I should not have allowed myself to be provoked, especially by
such a
> > pathetic excuse for a Usenet participant as he is. Someone who only
drives
> > other people off and dreams of making money in his vile profession out
of
> > people's expressions in this medium.
> >
> >
> > > Hey Mike, Davey thinks you're my boyfriend or is he talking about
> > > something more than three years old and over with, again?
> > >
> >
> > I think you two are lovers, on and off, even now.
> >
> > That's what I think.
> >
> > And I think I'm entitled to my opinion.
>
> In your opinion there is some cuckholding going on?
>
That's just my opinion.
> > > >If you ask someone a question, how can you then take offence if they
> > answer
> > > >it?
> > >
> > > Since no umbrage was taken, the putative offence against you was all
> > > in your mind. I asked you a question because of what I understood and,
> > > more likely, I misunderstood something because I didn't read every
single
> > > post that happened over the past few weeks.
> > >
> > >
> > > >That's fairly typical of the weasly, manipulative behaviour of you
and
> > your
> > > >friends.
> > >
> > > There's no need to get snarky. You misunderstood, I misunderstood, it
> > > happens.
> > >
> >
> > Aha. It was all just one big misunderstanding.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >It's not like I came back and reposted the Book of Samson and
Dallillah
> > over
> > > >again, although I admit I am tempted.
> > >
> > > It's better reading than the choader-bot; though, that is saying
little
> > > about your writing and more about the choader.
> > >
> >
> > If you don't like my writing you can always do better.
>
> That would require an upgrade to the software and hardware.
Not to mention the wetware.
>
> >
> > > >> > [snip]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >Yeah. He, thanks to you, is now the wittiest man left on the
group.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Which "he" are you talking about: Mike, this little soc of yours,
> > > >> > or Chaney and the DarthChumleyChoadBot?
> > > >> >
> > > >
> > > >Chaney, of course.
> > >
> > > Poor Matt, considered less witty than Chaney.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >I am telling you that it is blindingly obvious to the casual visitor
that
> > > >Steve Chaney now owns this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > Owns, nah. Perpetual kicktoy, yes.
> >
> > In marrowmind, you can call him kicktoy.
>
> Who is the toy and who is the kicker?
A question of eternal significance.
> >
> > >
> > > Of couse, because kooks have little life -- despite his alleged
> > > impending fatherhood, in Chaney's case -- their noise volume is
> > > signifiantly greater than the signal volume of the real members.
> > > An old-timer did a drive-by a month or so ago and commented that
> > > Chaney has shown no change in a decade, which is pretty sad.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, Steve's gonna have a kid?
> >
> > Congratulations, Steve, that's great news.
> >
> > > >> > I'm surprised at your lack of clarity and your lack of
perspective.
> > > >> > This newsgroup has gone through several incarnations and
personnel
> > > >> > changes over the years. If we lack witty men, it's only because
> > > >> > CB and Matt K have lives that deminish their volumn as compared
to
> > > >> > the eternal fount of kookitude that is Chaney.
> > > >
> > > >Aaah, so you _did_ know I was talking about Chaney.
> > >
> > > No. However, if you add the DarthChumleyBot, the Chaney
> > > froggeries, and real Chaney posts, he's easily is in
> > > the 1-2 ku (Kulkis) range or major kook.
> >
> > Aaron Kulkis is a friend of mine. You leave him outta this.
> >
> > > The old article by George with the ppm (post-per-month)
> > > calculations for what constitutes a ku:
> > > <w0jk4.757$F55.12470@nnrp1-w.snfc21.pbi.net>#1/1
> > >
> > > Interestingly enough the orgins of the kulkis come
> > > from the Chaney standard of 330 ppm.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Does he stammer when he talks on the telephone?
> > > >
> > > >Well?
> > >
> > > Since I have never talked directly with him on
> > > the phone, I am unable to answer the question
> > > as you have asked it. And, since I did post
> > > an appology for the voicemail comment, I
> > > have no desire to open that up again. If
> > > you want to stir something up, do your own
> > > dirty work.
> >
> > Okay, if you appologised, then I appologise for dragging it up.
>
> It reminds me of the apology that John Belushi gives
> in "Animal House" after he smashes the folk singer's
> guitar.
>
70*7^7;-)...
> >
> > >
> > > [snip what Davey has missed]
> > >
> > > >Well, I'm not back.
> > >
> > > Your loss.
> > >
> > > [snip the snarky comment]
> > >
> > > Allisson
> > >
> > > --
> > > - "Relata refero. Ne Iupeter quidem omibus placet"
> > > (I only tell you what I heard. Even Jove himself
> > > cannot please everyone) -- Anon.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
> >
> > "Caveat canem" - some ex Usenet poster right now.
>
>
> Crash Street Kidd
"Ubi estaba tu motto latino?"
-(where was your latin motto?)
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 |
|
|