In article <bg864g$dt3$1@news.onet.pl>,
Piorokrat <piorokrat@autograf.pl> wrote:
>
>Uzytkownik "Canader Canader" <canaduher@beer.com> napisal w wiadomosci
>news:d8119f70.0307291032.5abb1813@posting.google.com...
>> allisson@panix.com (Allisson) wrote in message
>news:<bg60ap$md8$1@panix5.panix.com>...
>> > In article <b9b3de8.0307290321.18c5e802@posting.google.com>,
>> > David writes as Jerzy Jakubowski <branchofjesse@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > [snip]
>> >
>> > Davey on Mike:
>> > >>
>> > >> >> Naah. Don't call it. Just chase it. You're a lawyer, don't forget.
>> >
>> > And you were going to leave and *never* post again, or was that
>> > only under your real name and prexisting socs?
>
>Your boyfriend lawyer axed me a question.
And you were going to *never* post again -- which pretty much
read as a great big grandstanding statement, but I digress --
actually, I though you were going to leave Usenet all together,
or so you implied.
Hey Mike, Davey thinks you're my boyfriend or is he talking about
something more than three years old and over with, again?
>If you ask someone a question, how can you then take offence if they answer
>it?
Since no umbrage was taken, the putative offence against you was all
in your mind. I asked you a question because of what I understood and,
more likely, I misunderstood something because I didn't read every single
post that happened over the past few weeks.
>That's fairly typical of the weasly, manipulative behaviour of you and your
>friends.
There's no need to get snarky. You misunderstood, I misunderstood, it
happens.
>
>It's not like I came back and reposted the Book of Samson and Dallillah over
>again, although I admit I am tempted.
It's better reading than the choader-bot; though, that is saying little
about your writing and more about the choader.
>> > [snip]
>> >
>> > >Yeah. He, thanks to you, is now the wittiest man left on the group.
>> >
>> > Which "he" are you talking about: Mike, this little soc of yours,
>> > or Chaney and the DarthChumleyChoadBot?
>> >
>
>Chaney, of course.
Poor Matt, considered less witty than Chaney.
>
>I am telling you that it is blindingly obvious to the casual visitor that
>Steve Chaney now owns this newsgroup.
Owns, nah. Perpetual kicktoy, yes.
Of couse, because kooks have little life -- despite his alleged
impending fatherhood, in Chaney's case -- their noise volume is
signifiantly greater than the signal volume of the real members.
An old-timer did a drive-by a month or so ago and commented that
Chaney has shown no change in a decade, which is pretty sad.
>> > I'm surprised at your lack of clarity and your lack of perspective.
>> > This newsgroup has gone through several incarnations and personnel
>> > changes over the years. If we lack witty men, it's only because
>> > CB and Matt K have lives that deminish their volumn as compared to
>> > the eternal fount of kookitude that is Chaney.
>
>Aaah, so you _did_ know I was talking about Chaney.
No. However, if you add the DarthChumleyBot, the Chaney
froggeries, and real Chaney posts, he's easily is in
the 1-2 ku (Kulkis) range or major kook.
The old article by George with the ppm (post-per-month)
calculations for what constitutes a ku:
<w0jk4.757$F55.12470@nnrp1-w.snfc21.pbi.net>#1/1
Interestingly enough the orgins of the kulkis come
from the Chaney standard of 330 ppm.
>
>Does he stammer when he talks on the telephone?
>
>Well?
Since I have never talked directly with him on
the phone, I am unable to answer the question
as you have asked it. And, since I did post
an appology for the voicemail comment, I
have no desire to open that up again. If
you want to stir something up, do your own
dirty work.
[snip what Davey has missed]
>Well, I'm not back.
Your loss.
[snip the snarky comment]
Allisson
--
- "Relata refero. Ne Iupeter quidem omibus placet"
(I only tell you what I heard. Even Jove himself
cannot please everyone) -- Anon.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 |
|