On 7 Gru, 12:33, "Uncle Davey" <jerzy.jakubow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oyez! oyez! oyez!
>
> Roll up for the chance to win one of three fabulous prizes in the great
> David Sienkiewicz reality proving contest!
>
> This is open to Horn and Harvest dancer, or anyone else such as Dr John
> Wilkins, Dr Day and others who had email correspondence with this
> alledged person prior to their alledged death, and also to any other
> enterprising individuals who would like to win something of value in
> addition to kudos by exercising their investigative skills.
>
> The rules are, that the proof that Sienkiewicz existed as an individual
> must be documentary, unforgeable, and unambiguous. It must be provided
> in this thread, and prior to midnight your local time at the end of
> this year, ie 31st December 2006. If it is something which could have
> been forged electronically then the original should be forwarded to me
> at a mailing address I will give privately to the poster in e-mail. In
> the event that more than one piece of qualifying evidence is posted by
> more than one person there will be a second prize. For each individual
> piece of evidence, only the person posting it first will qualify, and
> there will be up to three prizes if three separate pieces of qualifying
> evidence are given.
>
> Remember for each of the pieces of evidence, only the first to post it
> here will qualify, unless they fail to send it my mail if reasonably
> requested, in which case the second person to pst it willbe given the
> chance. However the first, second and third prizes will not be decided
> chronologically, but by the quality of the evidence. The extent to
> which it proves beyond all doubt that this person was bona fide.
>
> Each individual, or household, may only receive one prize.
>
> If no adequate evidence appears, then there will not be any prizes.
>
> All prizes will be given in the first two weeks of January, 2007.
>
> First prize:
>
> Eighty US dollars worth of purchases from any website which accepts
> credit cards on a secure interface. You will give me the address to
> send the prize to, and let me know the goods you choose and the link to
> the site ofering them. If I am not sure that the CC interface is safe,
> I have the right to ask you to choose an alternative, until a credible
> site is selected. For the avoidance of doubt, known sites and reputable
> ones such as Amazon are definitely ok, the sorts of ones that spam
> dodgy and illegal goods are definitely not, neither are illegal goods
> or pornography acceptable as prizes. The cost of postage and packing
> must be included, and if the amount is less than the full prize value
> then the "change" will be forfeited, any taxation on the prize in the
> prizewinner's jurisdiction is the responsibility of the prizewinner.
>
> Second prize:
>
> Conditions as above, but for fifty dollars.
>
> Third prize:
>
> Conditions as above, but for thirty dollars.
>
> Alternative to goods:
>
> Any prizewinner, if there are any, may elect to have the prize money
> paid to a charity of their choice as long as that charity has a secure
> internet payment mechanism. In this case I do not need a mailing
> address from the prizewinner. The sending of the money to the charity
> will contain the name of the prizewinner as the donor if they wish, as
> long as the name they give is decent.
>
> My decisions as to the awarding of prizes will be in the first 3 days
> of January, and are final.
>
> Entry to the competition, and any posts made to this thread, imply
> acceptance of these rules.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Uncle Davey
OK,
There are only 2 days left to win these valuable prizes. There has been
no evidence forthcoming yet, neither does Mr Horn himself appear to
have anything to say on the matter.
I have left talk.origins out this time, as the moderator, like a baby,
changes the subject headers of what I write, because instead of being a
group reaching to know objective truth about things, the place has
become just a power kick to him.
Please don't miss the deadline.
It's a question of speak now, or forever hold your peace.
I won't need to do the same thing again, as it must be pretty obvious
to anyone whose opinion is objective that if Sienkie were not merely a
puppet, it would be easy enough for someone in the US to dredge up some
evidence that is publicaly available if you live there (which I don't
or I would do it myself) and make some easy money.
What would be cool is if Horn actually had the nads to own up to having
uncoughed socks and telling both friend and foe the porky that he knew
Sienkiewicz personally, even making people undergo sensations of grief
when he put his sock to death. I think Horn ought to own up to this,
but he has backed himself into a corner of not being able to do so by
hypocritically taking the higher ground about other people's socks,
even when they were coughed up to and apologised for in a short space
of time.
HNY
Uncle Davey
|
|