Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Grinder <grinder@no.spam.maam.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: A riddle that was set me...
References: <dirgbm$qgf$0@pita.alt.net> <0tc4f.249987$084.245527@attbi_s22> <mvq2l153hhuegflas0f6vqs8f0kaor3trb@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <mvq2l153hhuegflas0f6vqs8f0kaor3trb@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <8ph4f.441707$_o.160834@attbi_s71>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.207.33.34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s71 1129423556 12.207.33.34 (Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:45:56 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:45:56 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:45:56 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:4120
Allow me to break this conundrum down to its simplest form:
Premises:
1) Man has free will.
2) God is omniscient.
For a given decision, with two choices, A and B:
3) God, being omniscient, knows the man will choose B.
4) Man, has two choices:
a) He freely chooses A, and shows God to be wrong,
or *not* omniscient.
b) He freely chooses B, as God knew he would all
along.
So here we are. There is *only one choice*, 4b, that
can be made without violating Premise #2. If, however,
man is not free to make either choice, that violoates
Premise #1.
Where is the flaw in this logic, or what is the means
by which you can circumvent it?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 |
|