alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: Varvarians, shale on you!!! (was Re: Questions for Young Earth Creationists) www.usenetposts.com
Uncle Davey (noway@jose.com) 2005/08/08 03:47

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Varvarians, shale on you!!! (was Re: Questions for Young Earth Creationists)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:47:48 +0200
Organization: www.usenetposts.com
Lines: 37
Sender: news@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <dd79sp$cen$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <SAbIe.104797$%K2.87026@pd7tw1no> <1123199213.535199.106120@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <dcv6md$nu9$0@pita.alt.net> <s4JIe.119960$%K2.45229@pd7tw1no> <1123246059.815681.309470@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <akJIe.120050$%K2.50321@pd7tw1no> <dd22es$of6$0@pita.alt.net> <slrndfb4bu.6hq.mightymartianca@nobody.here> <dd5sbt$l9j$0@pita.alt.net> <1123466715.172507.48520@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin.ediacara.org
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1123494034 77244 128.100.83.246 (8 Aug 2005 09:40:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:40:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:4102



news:1123466715.172507.48520@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> Snip
>
> > Some aspects of YEC are true and some parts of Gosse are
> > true, in my view.
>
> Which "aspects" are objectively, scientifically, or empirically true?
> Be ready to cite evidence.

I said they were true in my view.
In my view, things don't need to be empirically proven to be true, in fact
the opposite is sometimes the case - things which appear to be empirically
proven are only so in the context of the giant circular argument that is
secular and evolutionary thinking.

>
> Snip
>
> > I have not however seen a convincing disproving of either
> > the Gosseist or the modern YEC position.
>
> What hasn't been effectively, scientifically, objectively, or
> scientifically disproven as much as science can do that?
>

We're having a separate discussion about that, and I'm still waiting for
your first response.

Take your time, we've got all the time it takes.

Uncle Davey



Follow-ups:123456
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite