news:1123466715.172507.48520@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> Snip
>
> > Some aspects of YEC are true and some parts of Gosse are
> > true, in my view.
>
> Which "aspects" are objectively, scientifically, or empirically true?
> Be ready to cite evidence.
I said they were true in my view.
In my view, things don't need to be empirically proven to be true, in fact
the opposite is sometimes the case - things which appear to be empirically
proven are only so in the context of the giant circular argument that is
secular and evolutionary thinking.
>
> Snip
>
> > I have not however seen a convincing disproving of either
> > the Gosseist or the modern YEC position.
>
> What hasn't been effectively, scientifically, objectively, or
> scientifically disproven as much as science can do that?
>
We're having a separate discussion about that, and I'm still waiting for
your first response.
Take your time, we've got all the time it takes.
Uncle Davey
|
|