Glenn wrote:
<snipped>
Hey! It's Glenn again!
Now let's get back to a question you have been very conspicuouly not
answering:
You accept that the evidence from the natural world tells us that the
Universe is very ancient - of the order of 15 billion years - and that
the earth is over 4 billion years old.
Do you think that this is a false impression, or do you think the world
is truly of this age?
You have made it clear that you don't know why the earth has this
appearance of age. Fine. That's an honest answer. However, why should
anyone believe that the impression given by the evidence of great age
is false?
Now, my expectation is that you will try to change the subject, go off
on an irrelevant tangent, resort to invective chosen from your rich
repertoire of evasive manoevers.
So why not prove me wrong, and give a straight answer to the question?
Go on. Dare you.
RF
|
|