On Fri, 27 May 2005 14:29:46 +0200,
Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
> news:1117156347.935270.105010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>> Uncle Davey wrote:
> news:1117049660.239401.321690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Frank Pericope wrote:
>> > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
>> > > > > news:1116969431.170303.3370@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [snip]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Has anyone here other than the possible other soque poupets of
>> > this
>> > > > > > > scriptwriter (David Horn, Anastasia, Frank Pericope, Son of
> Fred,
>> > > > > Augray -
>> > > > > > > I'm not 100% sure about Augray, but he's on my suspect list)
> ever
>> > MET
>> > > > > David
>> > > > > > > Sienkiewicz?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [snip]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Uncle Davey
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Davey,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I am disappointed to find, upon dropping by, that despite having
>> > gone
>> > > > > > well out of my way in the past to prove to your satisfaction
> that I
>> > am
>> > > > > > no one's sock puppet you continue to attempt to besmirch my
> identity
>> > > > > > with claims that I am.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > What you proved is that you're not Ninure Saunders.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You haven't proven that you are not the same person as Carson
> West.
>> > for
>> > > > > instance. As an ex-cop he could easily copy loads of IDs to partly
>> > blank out
>> > > > > and scan and e-mail to people.
>> > > >
>> > > > I don't have to prove any such thing; having demonstrated my
> integrity
>> > > > already, the burden of proof in this and all future instances is on
>> > > > you. It rests with you in no small part because of your past
> failures
>> > > > to demonstrate an equivalent level of integrity. <shrug>
>> > > >
>> > > > Of course, according to the kind of reasoning that issues from you
> in
>> > > > this and other threads, it's also possible that God could turn
> Carson
>> > > > West(temporarily, I'm sure) into a stealthy super-bat (a feathered
> one,
>> > > > perhaps?) that could fly all the way to your house and bite you, I
>> > > > suppose. You can't prove God can't to that, right? Sheesh.
>> > > >
>> > > > What I wonder is: what kind of mind thinks so suspiciously of
> others,
>> > > > and why?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I'm assuming this is a rhetorical question.
>> > >
>> > > It reminds me of the classic homophobe who turns out to be gay.
>> > > Remember 'American Beauty'? If you have not seen it, you should.
>> > >
>> > > David D.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I'm not a homophobe. I may not agree that homosexuality is okay in the
> sight
>> > of God, but that doesn't mean I have anything against them personally,
>> > meither do I sit in judgment over them.
>> >
>> > Uncle Davey
>>
>> The homophobe bit was a comparison not an accusation. I have no idea
>> if you are a homophobe or not.
>>
>> David D.
>>
>
> I'm a sinophobe, (I'm referring to sins, not Chinese people, by the way) but
> I have nothing against homosexuals as individual people. They have their
> sins, I have mine, and I don't make out that my womanising past is a great
> thing. It was sinful, and also what they do is sinful. Let's repent of our
> respective sins, not wallow in them, and 'celebrate' them.
Why don't you just let consenting adults do what they want, and quit
worrying about other peoples alleged sins. You know what Jesus said about
people pulling needles out of their brother's eye.
--
mightymartianca@hotmail.com
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 |
|