alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: To those who CONTINUE to attack Dr Gastrich E-proxy Rescinds
Uncle Davey (noway@jose.com) 2005/05/27 06:29

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: To those who CONTINUE to attack Dr Gastrich
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:29:46 +0200
Organization: E-proxy Rescinds
Lines: 113
Sender: news@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <d773vt$5et$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <0tednTCENLzQTuDfRVnyrg@giganews.com> <hLidnUitX7F6GuPfRVn-iw@megapath.net> <nzzfe.13398$ye1.10077@okepread06> <0vSdnXj5aeXu0OLfRVn-jw@megapath.net> <S7Xge.17404$ye1.2006@okepread06> <d621ml$b7e$0@pita.alt.net> <l6fhe.17480$ye1.878@okepread06> <d64u5v$q3u$0@pita.alt.net> <lTnhe.17497$ye1.9746@okepread06> <d65tbn$qve$0@pita.alt.net> <gyAhe.17564$ye1.10180@okepread06> <d67pd6$mjk$0@pita.alt.net> <1116969431.170303.3370@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <d7090k$3nd$0@pita.alt.net> <1117024733.897957.127660@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1117049660.239401.321690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <d74oi1$pcl$0@pita.alt.net> <1117156347.935270.105010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin.ediacara.org
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1117196250 22762 128.100.83.246 (27 May 2005 12:17:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:17:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Greylisting: NO DELAY (Relay+Sender autoqualified);processed by UCSD_GL-v1.2 on mailbox8.ucsd.edu;
X-Spam-Level: Level *
X-Spamscanner: mailbox8.ucsd.edu (v1.6 Apr 6 2005 07:48:50, 1.2/5.0 3.0.0)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 69252 j4RCVwZg070716 mailbox8.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:4008



news:1117156347.935270.105010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Uncle Davey wrote:



news:1117049660.239401.321690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Frank Pericope wrote:
> > > > Uncle Davey wrote:

> > > > > news:1116969431.170303.3370@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [snip]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone here other than the possible other soque poupets of
> > this
> > > > > > > scriptwriter (David Horn, Anastasia, Frank Pericope, Son of
Fred,
> > > > > Augray -
> > > > > > > I'm not 100% sure about Augray, but he's on my suspect list)
ever
> > MET
> > > > > David
> > > > > > > Sienkiewicz?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [snip]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uncle Davey
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Davey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am disappointed to find, upon dropping by, that despite having
> > gone
> > > > > > well out of my way in the past to prove to your satisfaction
that I
> > am
> > > > > > no one's sock puppet you continue to attempt to besmirch my
identity
> > > > > > with claims that I am.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > What you proved is that you're not Ninure Saunders.
> > > > >
> > > > > You haven't proven that you are not the same person as Carson
West.
> > for
> > > > > instance. As an ex-cop he could easily copy loads of IDs to partly
> > blank out
> > > > > and scan and e-mail to people.
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to prove any such thing; having demonstrated my
integrity
> > > > already, the burden of proof in this and all future instances is on
> > > > you. It rests with you in no small part because of your past
failures
> > > > to demonstrate an equivalent level of integrity. <shrug>
> > > >
> > > > Of course, according to the kind of reasoning that issues from you
in
> > > > this and other threads, it's also possible that God could turn
Carson
> > > > West(temporarily, I'm sure) into a stealthy super-bat (a feathered
one,
> > > > perhaps?) that could fly all the way to your house and bite you, I
> > > > suppose. You can't prove God can't to that, right? Sheesh.
> > > >
> > > > What I wonder is: what kind of mind thinks so suspiciously of
others,
> > > > and why?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm assuming this is a rhetorical question.
> > >
> > > It reminds me of the classic homophobe who turns out to be gay.
> > > Remember 'American Beauty'? If you have not seen it, you should.
> > >
> > > David D.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not a homophobe. I may not agree that homosexuality is okay in the
sight
> > of God, but that doesn't mean I have anything against them personally,
> > meither do I sit in judgment over them.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
>
> The homophobe bit was a comparison not an accusation.  I have no idea
> if you are a homophobe or not.
>
> David D.
>

I'm a sinophobe, (I'm referring to sins, not Chinese people, by the way) but
I have nothing against homosexuals as individual people. They have their
sins, I have mine, and I don't make out that my womanising past is a great
thing. It was sinful, and also what they do is sinful. Let's repent of our
respective sins, not wallow in them, and 'celebrate' them.

 Uncle Davey



Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
3031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite