news:1117156347.935270.105010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Uncle Davey wrote:
news:1117049660.239401.321690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Frank Pericope wrote:
> > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > news:1116969431.170303.3370@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [snip]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone here other than the possible other soque poupets of
> > this
> > > > > > > scriptwriter (David Horn, Anastasia, Frank Pericope, Son of
Fred,
> > > > > Augray -
> > > > > > > I'm not 100% sure about Augray, but he's on my suspect list)
ever
> > MET
> > > > > David
> > > > > > > Sienkiewicz?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [snip]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uncle Davey
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Davey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am disappointed to find, upon dropping by, that despite having
> > gone
> > > > > > well out of my way in the past to prove to your satisfaction
that I
> > am
> > > > > > no one's sock puppet you continue to attempt to besmirch my
identity
> > > > > > with claims that I am.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > What you proved is that you're not Ninure Saunders.
> > > > >
> > > > > You haven't proven that you are not the same person as Carson
West.
> > for
> > > > > instance. As an ex-cop he could easily copy loads of IDs to partly
> > blank out
> > > > > and scan and e-mail to people.
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to prove any such thing; having demonstrated my
integrity
> > > > already, the burden of proof in this and all future instances is on
> > > > you. It rests with you in no small part because of your past
failures
> > > > to demonstrate an equivalent level of integrity. <shrug>
> > > >
> > > > Of course, according to the kind of reasoning that issues from you
in
> > > > this and other threads, it's also possible that God could turn
Carson
> > > > West(temporarily, I'm sure) into a stealthy super-bat (a feathered
one,
> > > > perhaps?) that could fly all the way to your house and bite you, I
> > > > suppose. You can't prove God can't to that, right? Sheesh.
> > > >
> > > > What I wonder is: what kind of mind thinks so suspiciously of
others,
> > > > and why?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm assuming this is a rhetorical question.
> > >
> > > It reminds me of the classic homophobe who turns out to be gay.
> > > Remember 'American Beauty'? If you have not seen it, you should.
> > >
> > > David D.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not a homophobe. I may not agree that homosexuality is okay in the
sight
> > of God, but that doesn't mean I have anything against them personally,
> > meither do I sit in judgment over them.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
>
> The homophobe bit was a comparison not an accusation. I have no idea
> if you are a homophobe or not.
>
> David D.
>
I'm a sinophobe, (I'm referring to sins, not Chinese people, by the way) but
I have nothing against homosexuals as individual people. They have their
sins, I have mine, and I don't make out that my womanising past is a great
thing. It was sinful, and also what they do is sinful. Let's repent of our
respective sins, not wallow in them, and 'celebrate' them.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 |
|