Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Concerned Citizen" <conners_3@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: 51 House members call on Gonzales to appoint special counsel on alleged U.S. 'war crimes'
Date: 16 May 2005 16:40:08 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <1116286808.319512.8170@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <863c81p02unumdjdm1d4nspmn5vdftpi2f@4ax.com>
<n2kd815ibkfku8mnm074ak6h86sv46v7tk@4ax.com>
<3okd81lbi6f3nb3psnln6c5d5rmfqsgpjd@4ax.com>
<q3he819pqrhribfhuln02nos2ijevlc5dt@4ax.com>
<a06f81tgsvqr0i3n22qp46gb9rh2bea5ch@4ax.com>
<42883F15.1343949@drunkenbastards.org.ies>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.209.13.229
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1116286813 14483 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2005 23:40:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <42883F15.1343949@drunkenbastards.org.ies>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.209.13.229;
posting-account=IyH0Ig0AAACKtt95F-UOe8ZrmNY64CAP
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3972
redc1c4 wrote:
> miguel wrote:
>
> (mercy snipage occurs)
>
> > Spare us your idiocy, please.
>
> physician, heal thyself...........
>
This is a letter of love and peace; I will not lash out against anyone,
and I will not use specific names of individuals or organizations that
dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost
stories. That said, let me merely point out that you can really assume
serious trouble is brewing when raving tossers nail people to trees.
You see, I honestly believe that us.military.army has no idea what it's
doing. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and
inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude
and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that you shouldn't let
us.military.army intimidate you. You shouldn't let it push you around.
We're the ones who are right, not us.military.army. By toning down its
treatises, many more people are exposed to us.military.army's
homophobic, subhuman message, convinced by its passion, and seduced by
its simplistic answers to complex social problems. So,
us.military.army, maybe the problem is not with birdbrained slimeballs,
but with you.
In spite of all us.military.army has done, I must admit I really like
the organization. No, just kidding. Enough is enough. Sounds pretty
froward, doesn't it? But is it any more so than us.military.army's
unrealistic, muddleheaded circulars? Us.military.army's animadversions
are a mixture of inhumane self-righteousness and fastidious duplicity.
Which brings me to my next criticism of us.military.army.
If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being
sufficiently open-minded to understand that us.military.army will
probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all criticism.
It will put me down as "disloyal" or "ethically bankrupt". That's its
standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except
the most fawning praise. When I was a child, my clergyman told me,
"Us.military.army is a venom-spouting tadpole swimming in a lecherous
pond." If you think about it, you'll see his point. Only through
education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to
review the basic issues at the root of the debate. But the first step
is to acknowledge that it would not hesitate to increase people's
stress and aggression if it felt it could benefit from doing so. Thus,
in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) The majority of nutty
meatheads probably agree that I have no interest in getting tangled in
the rhetoric or dogma that us.military.army frequently pushes, and 2)
I, not being one of the many manipulative tax cheats of this world,
find us.military.army's views symptomatic of a dangerous but spreading
mentality.
|
|