On Sun, 15 May 2005 05:47:36 -0700, Colin Campbell
<activated_95b@earthlink.net (remove underscore)> wrote:
>On Sat, 14 May 2005 21:42:12 -0700, miguel <mjc@drizzle.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>You have to remember that there are two purposes to these types of
>>>investigations:
>>>
>>>1) Identify the guilty
>>>2) Clear the names of the innocent
>>>
>>>What would you do if the investigations determine that the claims are
>>>unfounded clears the accused?
>>
>>That's like asking "what if superman were german?"
>
>Ah - so basically you are saying that you do not care for the facts or
>if the accused are actually guilty? They are 'guilty' of doing
>something which you disagree with politically and therefore must be
>punished?
>
you came up with this brilliant deduction from this one sentence?
>
is this the way you try and win debates - by making up what a person
means? I've have yet to see anyone agree with whatever gross
deliberate misinterpretations of what you conclude they mean. Now
would be a good time to stop doing this. It doesn't work for you.
Another suggestion... do stop starting a paragraph with "I take it..."
with another attempt to grossly misdirect what a person says simply
to suit your own personal views. That clearly doesn't work for you.
|
|