In our last episode <d65ppn$l6h$0@pita.alt.net>, Uncle Davey pirouetted
gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
>
> Uzytkownik "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> napisal w
> wiadomosci news:wbGdndDnorqdoxjfRVn-hA@megapath.net...
>> In our last episode <d6362n$ca5$0@pita.alt.net>, Uncle Davey pirouetted
>> gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
>>
>>
>> > Uzytkownik "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> napisal w
>> > wiadomosci news:ia6dneu7ztpvLBnfRVn-iw@megapath.net...
>> >> In our last episode <d62adu$s23$0@pita.alt.net>, Uncle Davey
>> >> pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Uzytkownik "lizzard woman" <kimosabeRMOVE@shaw.ca> napisal w
>> >> > wiadomosci news:ST1he.1335475$6l.435007@pd7tw2no...
>> >> >> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:d621ml$b7e$0@pita.alt.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (snip)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> | Let his Church give him a stipend for his work like so many
>> >> >> | other people
>> >> >> get
>> >> >> | for much less effect, and I'm sure the ads would disappear like
>> >> >> | morning
>> >> >> dew,
>> >> >> | but the guy's got to live off something.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I know this is going to sound heretical and all but he could get a
>> >> >> real
>> >> > job
>> >> >> you know.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yeah. And so could all Church workers, and maybe you atheists would
>> > prefer
>> >> > that, as they wouldn't have time to communicate our beliefs.
>> >>
>> >> Since you two define "communicate beliefs" as "provoke and attack
> people
>> >> who disagree," yeah, I think everybody would prefer you didn't have
> time
>> >> for that.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, how *do you explain that Gastrich manages to piss off
> people
>> >> even in *Christian* online forums? Is there *any forum *anywhere he
>> >> hasn't pissed pretty much everybody off?
>> >>
>> >> > He has a viable business in his web hosting, and whilst that may
>> >> > not be enough to keep the wolves from the door on its own would you
> really
>> > prefer
>> >> > it if he took an employment place that could be had by someone
> totally
>> >> > unable to create their own business, and who would be destitute in
>> >> > a
>> > short
>> >> > space of time if they didn't have that job?
>> >> >
>> >> > What makes a "real job" in the new economy?
>> >>
>> >> <snork>
>> >>
>> >> The "new economy" fad died in the '90s. Do try to keep up.
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >
>> > Heh heh. Wearing last year's Prado am I?
>> >
>> > It's still with us, matey boy, it just stopped being called 'new'.
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> That must be why they tech workforce has been flat for four years. No,
>> wait, it's been contracting. Real booming sector that...
>>
>>
> I didn't say that, but if you wanna twist my words, what can I do?
Listen, Dishonesty Boy, it's not "twisting" anything to point out the
stagnant condition of the tech sector to someone who's still bandying that
discredited phrase "new economy" around.
You know what "new economy" actually meant? "I don't have a business
plan!" That's what it meant...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 |
|