| Re: Hey Allisson, you silly caaah, eat your words! |
PANIX -- Public Access N .. |
| Allisson (allisson@panix.com) |
2004/12/29 23:20 |
In article <cqmp7f$u1h$0@pita.alt.net>, Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>What was all that two years ago pooh poohing my views about the MMR?
IIRC, my comment was that the MMR had nothing to do with autism.
The 'scientist' who published that it did has been discredited and
discounted.
>
>I was right all along.
>
>Look at today's headlines in the UK observer
>
>http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1379771,00.html?79%3A+Uk+latest
According to the article you cite. Parent's whose claim is for the
MMR to cause autism are ineligible to claim damages.
[snip of article]
>Let's hope you listened to my advice back then and didn't give the single
>vaccine to your queed.
John's and my daughters won't recieve it until their 12month visit. They
are not quite 9 months old. Additionally, the risk of any of the alleged
effects (encephalitis, for example) is about 1 out of a million.
>And don't you accuse me of whining, this time, Mr "Netiquette" Cranstonthal,
>let's face it, it's 100% your queed too, in all probability.
I'd say your grasp of probability is as great as that
likelihood of an infant contracting encephalitis from the MMR (.0001%)
When you want to debate using facts rather than emotion, let me know.
Allisson
--
--
Who has time for a signature?
|
|
|