alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: OT: Jason Gastrich Finds His Niche Newsfeeds.com http://www ..
\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank (lflank_nospam@ij.net) 2004/04/11 09:38

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: OT: Jason Gastrich Finds His Niche
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 201
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <407966ae_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <dc55e47f.0404071224.5626f8e5@posting.google.com> <Xns94C53A9D59490dickcrcomcastnet@216.196.97.136> <dc55e47f.0404080945.6c6d39ce@posting.google.com> <1gbxgyt.2ysdj71x07bggN%NOdaycdSPAM@hotmail.com> <Qsldc.5125$BR1.912@okepread03> <c5623n$js7$0@pita.alt.net> <1gbz397.7hk4p51hy6joaN%NOdaycdSPAM@hotmail.com> <c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net> <uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03> <c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net> <7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03> <c59n6v$eup$0@pita.alt.net> <407873c9_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c5bfev$l0s$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081697884 82417 128.100.83.246 (11 Apr 2004 15:38:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <c5bfev$l0s$0@pita.alt.net>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2004 15:39:28.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C9F41F0:01C41FDB]
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3251



Uncle Davey wrote:



>
>>
>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>
>>

>

>
>>>news:7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net...
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>news:uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net...
>>>>>>    No one believes he does not read these exchanges except for you,
>>>>>>Renfield, and even the departure of evil does not mean that it cannot
>>>
>>>be
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>discussed.  Stalin has been dead for over 50 years and his evil is
>>>
>>>still
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>discussed, as is Hitler's.  Whether Mr Gastrich is as evil as these
>>>>>
>>>>>men--and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I do not abide by 'levels' of evil, evil is still evil--we can also
>>>
>>>talk
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>about the evil transgressions of persons such as the evangelists who
>>>>
>>>>have
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>never posted in Usenet.  A lack of presence does not shield an evil
>>>>
>>>>person
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>from scrutiny or prosecution.  You are simply avoiding the facts, as
>>>
>>>you
>>>
>>>
>>>>>are
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>wont to do, and the ridiculous part of it is that you interjected
>>>>
>>>>yourself
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>into these discussions in the first place.  Deciding now that his
>>>>
>>>>absence
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>means he should not be discussed is interesting consider how long you
>>>>>
>>>>>*have*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>been discussing him.  If his absence means we cannot discuss him
>>>
>>>*now*,
>>>
>>>
>>>>>why
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>did his absence not mean we could not discuss him *before*, when you
>>>>
>>>>were
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>fully involved in these threads?
>>>>>>    Your capriciousness is so obvious, Renfield, as is your
>>>
>>>unilateral
>>>
>>>
>>>>>and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>rather questionable applications of what you would claim are polite
>>>>>>standards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Anastasia
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Like I say, I'm not discussing him, but if you want to talk about
>>>
>>>Hitler,
>>>
>>>
>>>>go
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>ahead.
>>>>
>>>>    I see you still will resort to rhetoric, little demon.  I will
>>>
>>>discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>>what I like; and I simply noted that the standard you presumed to invoke
>>>>yesterday was not the standard prior.  You invoked the standard out of
>>>>convenience and, I am sure, a recognition of the fact that your position
>>>
>>>was
>>>
>>>
>>>>indefensible, but that was not your *stated* reason.  So you were being
>>>>disingenuous.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I mean, screw Godwin.
>>>>
>>>>    It is a stupid "rule."
>>>>
>>>>    Anastasia
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Discuss what you like. I mean screw godwin, I agree it is a stupid rule.
>
> All
>
>>>I'm saying is that I'm not gonna be drawn on Jason, but I might be drawn
>
> on
>
>>>Hitler.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Translation;  "let's change the subject".
>>
>
>
> Correct. I'm not doing that subject, so let's change the subject.
>




Well, Davey, unfortunately for you, no one gives a flying fuck about
you, so you have neither the authority nor the ability to change the
subject.  <shrug>

Me, I rather like this subject, so I will stick with it for a while.
You are of course entirely free to tuck your tail between your balls and
flee, just like your, uh, "friend" Jason did.  Bye.





===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"

Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank

DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
30313233343536
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite