Uncle Davey wrote:
>
>>Dissident <qqqq@7600.net> wrote in message
>
> news:<40789B87.7020604@7600.net>...
>
>>>Charles C. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:54:01 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>>>><noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>If Charles Casey's wife was only good to him and a wife to him when he
>
> was
>
>>>>>well and able to provide, and then divorced him and had him put out on
>
> the
>
>>>>>street when he was unwell, then she was no better than a hooker, and
>
> the
>
>>>>>elders who enabled her to do it, they were like her pimps.
>>>>>
>>>>>And you can quote me on that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uncle Davey
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If my children read this post just how the hell do you think that they
>>>>will feel? This is the most thoughtless action you have ever taken. No
>>>>matter what she has done _*OUR*_ children do not deserve to read
>>>>statements like this one. I don't give a flying fuck how you attempt
>>>>to justify this you are one sick fucking troll with the brain capacity
>>>>equal to a pile of dog shit.
>>>>
>>>>You need help. There isn't a moral bone in your body. God damn I can't
>>>>believe how fucking low you can go. How the hell do you look at
>>>>yourself in the mirror? Get help you sick fuck.
>>>
>>>This is typical behavior for religious people. Rather than
>>>argue an issue on the merits, they hold up their children
>>>as a shield, make a special pleading based on that, and demand
>>>special rights. I've seen it a thousand times as a gay man.
>>>"We can't allow homosexuals to have legal relationships,
>>>because *children* might hear of their existence and then
>>>instantly convert to godless faggotry". I for one will continue
>>>to publicly air the merits of issues based on *all* claims,
>>>factual and otherwise, and let the chips fall where they
>>>may, and will not suppress, silence, or censor points of
>>>view because of what anyone's *children* may happen to hear.
>>>
>>>You are well within your rights to argue back against Davey
>>>on the basis that his accusations against you or your wife
>>>are unsupported by the facts, or that they are not factual
>>>at all, being rather ad hominem in nature. But to attempt to
>>>curtail discussion based on the likelihood that continuing
>>>it will embarass you in front of your children - well, that
>>>one could be used to good effect by all the religious creationists
>>>who have confidently taught their children the myth of Biblical
>>>inerrancy, and wish to suppress any public discussion to the
>>>contrary lest it lead to embarassment for them in front of
>>>their children.
>>>
>>>I am no Davey supporter, having seen him far too often
>>>on the other side of issues from myself, but I have a
>>>particular hot button when children are inserted into
>>>a discussion to curtail it, having seen this tactic
>>>used repeatedly by conservatives as a way of not having
>>>to make a substantive defense of issues where they have
>>>an unswayable emotional attachment to one way of thinking.
>>>That is why I react here.
>>>
>>>Saying that, I have to ask a practical question: do your
>>>children actually read talk.origins?
>>
>>If you think that I am holding my children up as a shield in a fundie
>>type maneuver then you need to figure out just what is actually going
>>on here and why. I am not going to type 6 pages for every person that
>>sees this and feels like commenting on it. If you are that curious you
>>can take the time to figure it out. If the title of this thread in
>>talk.origins with Davey involved doesn't give you a clue then I am at
>>a loss for words.
>>
>
>
> That guy's no supporter of mine, he just gave you a reality check.
>
What would you know about "reality", Davey. You have no life away from
a keyboard. And not much of one there, either.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
|