> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:<c59khn$90l$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > news:veWdc.6227$BR1.3408@okepread03...
> > > ""Rev Dr" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> > > news:40782be2$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > > >
> > > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>If Charles Casey's wife was only good to him and a wife to him
when
> > he
> > > > >>>was well and able to provide, and then divorced him and had him
put
> > out
> > on
> > the
> > > > >>>street when he was unwell, then she was no better than a hooker,
and
> > the
> > > > >>>elders who enabled her to do it, they were like her pimps.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>And you can quote me on that.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Nice trolling work.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Wassamatter, Davey -- not enough intestines providing you with
shit?
> > > > >
> > > > > I wrote it from the heart.
> > > >
> > > > Don't bullshit us, Davey. You HAVE no heart. Anyone who can poke
fun
> > > > at blind people (and then crosspost cruel spam to their newsgroup on
top
> > > > of it) has no human feelings at all, whatsoever.
> > >
> > > I do not understand. What is this?
> > >
> > > Anastasia
> > >
> >
> > Casey wrote something disparaging about blind people, I, in the answer,
> > added a blind people's group, and it suddenly became my fault that he
had
> > written that.
>
> I did not write disparaging stuff about blind people you troll. I made
> a rhetorical comment that has been said thousands of times with no ill
> intent. After explaining how you having a reading comprehension
> disorder I said "What good is a sight seeing tour of the world to a
> blind person", in other words you may be able to read other languages
> but you don't understand what the words mean. You, always seeking
> revenge, want to twist that into a disparaging remark about blind
> people. How about this Davey? What good is a petting zoo to a person
> that can't feel? How about what good is a foot race to a cripple? I am
> both, do you want to cross post this you stupid fuck?
Just because you are one, doesn't give you the right to disparage others in
the same boat. They may feel differently.
>
> You are looking for points in your revenge plans. You are a sick
> fucking troll and nothing more. There isn't a moral bone in your body.
> You are such a joke, you came here to tell us about Jesus and in the
> end we see that you don't have a clue as to who he was. You have no
> life so you are seeking a readership on usenet. Since you couldn't
> build one in the .soc groups you created sock puppets to rally around
> you hoping that if other people see how popular you are that they will
> start rallying around you too. That's all the ignorant masses needed
> was a little help to see is just how funny you really are. Then you
> state that everyone wants a readership. Do you realize how you have
> revealed what a sick and twisted mind you have? You are the type of
> person that thinks masturbating with a glove on somehow means that it
> isn't a sin because you didn't touch it.
>
You show me where it says masturbating is a sin full stop.
> You pretend to be disgusted by my ex-wife's behavior while posting
> such a disparaging header. You feel no disgust because you are
> incapable of feeling any emotion. Your intent here is quite clear.
> Your ass has been beat over and over and now you are looking for
> revenge in any manner that you can. Your sick Calvinistic ass is now
> pretending to be a nice guy with human emotion and somehow everyone
> else is the bad guy. You really hate me because I saw right through
> your transparent ass.
>
You were a cynic from the first, and no-one's ass is non-"transparent" to
someone with your degree of cynicism.
> You need psychiatric help. I am dead serious Davey, you need
> professional therapy. Your actions on usenet have nothing but a
> negative impact everywhere you go. These are not the actions of a
> Christian. Yes, you may claim to be a Christian but nothing you have
> done on usenet shows that you are actually a Christian. You are
> feeding a sick need of yours and nothing more.
What exactly are you doing responding then?
You take yourself off to the shrink first, and if he helps you out, let me
know, because then I'll know he might be able to help me. You're no less
messed up in the head than I or anyone else in this crazy place is.
>
> You brag about your wonderful marriage. How good can your marriage be
> if you are spending so much time on usenet? No woman that I know of
> would tolerate being ignored for just the amount of time you have
> spent here in T.O. not considering all the time you spent trolling all
> of the other groups. If you want to twist this and say that you are
> doing it at work then you obviously aren't the business man you claim
> to be. Either way you cut it one or the other is a lie. Now consider
> the thought patterns behind the sock puppets, the vanity group (no
> matter who you claim set it up, it doesn't matter) and the trolling of
> the newsgroups and crossposting messages into other groups when you
> think that a group of people will come to save your ass. This all
> takes time and thought. Any brain that thinks this up is a sick brain.
> This sick brain couldn't function in a relationship, business or
> romance. There is something wrong with that type of thinking because
> it is sociopath.
It's a hobby, which relaxes me in between other things.
I am not of the extrovert type that can just go from meeting to meeting
without a bit of time to myself, neither can I spend 24 hours a day giving
attention to anyone, no matter how special they are. I put this on the table
4 and a half years ago when I first started living with her, and one of the
fantastic things about her is that she understands that.
If having time to myself keeps me less stressed and I get rid of some
stresses right here, including on your more-than-willing hide, then what is
that to anyone who knows me? For that, the rest of my time is spent more
effectively.
If you think Usenet is a big waste of time, then why are you here?
>
> So you keep twisting and squirming and build all the strawmen that you
> think you need because the overall picture that you have painted here
> is quite revealing. Lenny pegged you and even after all of the things
> that he has said about you, all which happen to be right on the money
> as anyone that has followed your actions here can see, you still keep
> returning when a normal person would run for the hills and reevaluate
> their actions.
Lenny pegged me because he is the same. it takes one to know one. You're all
Usenet lifers, but you just wanna project your common problem, our common
problem, onto me.
>
> You are going to continue trying to use my story against me but what
> you don't realize is that you are just like those people. You are
> exactly like them and your sneaky two faced back handed actions here
> prove it. So if anyone had any doubts about anything I have said
> concerning Calvinists you came here and proved the point for me. If I
> was a member of your church and you felt this way about me you would
> be starting rumors and talking behind my back. Since you can't talk
> behind my back on usenet you create strawmen and twist my words which
> is the next best thing.
>
Talking behind one's back is the email backchannel, which I highly
discourage.
> So while you pretend to be shocked about my ex-wife you are exactly
> like her. You are a sick Calvinist on a power trip because nothing
> that you do will endanger your immortal soul. Now combine that with
> your sociopathic disorder and we have Uncle Davey the usenet troll.
> Judging by your pictures I bet that this is the only time you smile,
> when you read posts like this because you are finally the center of
> attention, right troll boy?
Right, right, right.
> How's your readership coming along troll?
I have no statistics.
How's yours?
> Are you satisfied yet? Negative attention is still attention right
> baby troll boy? What a pathetic world you have created for yourself. A
> little insecure boy trapped in a man's body, how pitiful.
>
If you say so. You should know.
>
> > Casey wrote a bunch of stuff about what his wife did to him, which
really
> > was appalling if it's true. I reacted in anger at this atrocious woman,
> > calling her what she is, in my opinion. Casey's reaction is that his
kids
> > will now be hurt, like it was me and not him that spilt all these
beanies
> > about this terrible woman and what she had done.
>
> You called their mother a prostitute you stupid insensitive troll.
>
I said no better than. She was not a literal prostitute, but then again
literal prostitutes don't take your house.
That's if what you said is even true.
> > Casey is someone who became very ill, believes that he was then rejected
by
> > his congregation when he became ill, and if that is true then they're a
> > bunch of bastards (I'll get wrong for this now, like Casey never said
about
> > them and what they did) and then reviewed his theology. According to his
own
> > words, he at first went to a Christian, non-Calvinist theology, but
recently
> > when he took some test, (probably the same test that said my creation
> > Constance Vigilant was 83% male, he seems to like these percentage
thingies)
> > it said he was 67% Christian. (Presumably in eternity this means he'll
have
> > two weeks in heaven for every one week in hell. Talk about living out of
a
> > suitcase.) Nevertheless, he blames very much the people who were in the
> > church he left, or rather their theology, which was written by a
mentally
> > ill person (there's no documentation that Calvin, Farel and Knox were in
any
> > way mentally ill, but I'm worried anyway, after all, they say, it takes
one
> > to know one) for making basically good people like what the Bible says
we
> > are (incredulous cough) into bad people, who were so bad to him.
> >
> > In short, Casey has a personality flaw that shifts away from himself all
the
> > blame for his actions onto others, or onto the theology he doesn't like.
And
> > so he sees himself as righteous, and believes it is possible to be
> > righteous.
>
> You are the one with a personality flaw troll boy. Keep twisting my
> words. I don't blame her for wanting a divorce stupid, I was useless
> as a human because I couldn't stay awake. I was a burden. It's the way
> they went about it. they planned behind my back for 8 months, and in
> the process they shunned my mother who was on her death bed. That's
> what makes them sick people, not that she wanted a divorce you stupid
> word twisting troll.
They made her divorce you against her will?
I hope you both are back together now, then.
> I doubt that you have a reading comprehension
> disorder, you look for ways to twist peoples words. Just like your
> process here with strawmen and word twisting, it's the mental process
> behind the actions that is sick. You want to preach Jesus fine, there
> is nothing wrong with that. Using sock puppets to insult people while
> you pretend to be so holy is. It's the process troll boy, it's the
> process.
It's the process.
>
> > I seriously prefer my theology, which states that what I need is to be
> > forgiven by God rather than to work out my salvation by a great effort
of
> > becoming righteous by works, because at least this way I have no problem
> > taking blame and coughing up to blame for the things I do which are
wrong,
> > (like calling you a bitch, and a minx I shouldn't have done that) and
not a
> > theology of perfection that can only be lived up to by shrugging off the
> > blame for anything one does onto everyone else.
>
> I do not shrug off blame for actions you lying troll. I even
> apologized to your mentally ill ass when I could no longer reference a
> post. How is that the actions of a person looking to shrug off
> responsibility you word twisting strawman building troll?
>
I accept your apology. I'm sorry if I didn't mention that earlier.
> You are far more pathetic than I ever realized. You look for every
> little gap so you can insert insults when twisting words. Just like
> your little weak pathetic God of the gaps right troll boy? It's the
> process you stupid lying troll. It's the thoughts behind the actions,
> the intent you sociopathic tapeworm. Your Calvinistic dogma allows you
> to call people names and to act in the most disgusting of ways because
> you aren't responsible for your actions since you will never be called
> on them. Once saved always saved. How pathetic, you, a man that takes
> absolutely no responsibility for any of your actions since they mean
> nothing on judgment day try to reverse that on to me. What a little
> pathetic man you are.
>
Either the OSAS doctrine is true, or I don't have a cat's chance in hell
anyway, so I'd better believe OSAS.
>
> > Casey has a pattern of doing this, and if he could be objective he would
see
> > that this shows where his theological argument falls down. Unfortunately
he
> > has a big team of enablers in this group who like him the way he is and
will
> > encourage him not to be objective.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
>
> Show me the pattern you lying troll. Cough it up. Show me the pattern.
> I will call you on every word twist that you attempt so you better be
> careful in what you say. Put up or shut up. Show me the pattern. Show
> everyone the pattern. Lets rock troll boy.
>
I showed you the pattern above, in the post you just responded to.
And the next time you do something in the pattern, I'll show you again.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 |
|