> "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
news:<407873c9_4@corp.newsgroups.com>...
> > Uncle Davey wrote:
> >
> > > news:7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03...
> > >
> > >>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>news:uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03...
> > >>>
> > >>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net...
> > >>>> No one believes he does not read these exchanges except for
you,
> > >>>>Renfield, and even the departure of evil does not mean that it
cannot
> > >
> > > be
> > >
> > >>>>discussed. Stalin has been dead for over 50 years and his evil is
> > >
> > > still
> > >
> > >>>>discussed, as is Hitler's. Whether Mr Gastrich is as evil as these
> > >>>
> > >>>men--and
> > >>>
> > >>>>I do not abide by 'levels' of evil, evil is still evil--we can also
> > >
> > > talk
> > >
> > >>>>about the evil transgressions of persons such as the evangelists who
> > >>
> > >>have
> > >>
> > >>>>never posted in Usenet. A lack of presence does not shield an evil
> > >>
> > >>person
> > >>
> > >>>>from scrutiny or prosecution. You are simply avoiding the facts, as
> > >
> > > you
> > >
> > >>>are
> > >>>
> > >>>>wont to do, and the ridiculous part of it is that you interjected
> > >>
> > >>yourself
> > >>
> > >>>>into these discussions in the first place. Deciding now that his
> > >>
> > >>absence
> > >>
> > >>>>means he should not be discussed is interesting consider how long
you
> > >>>
> > >>>*have*
> > >>>
> > >>>>been discussing him. If his absence means we cannot discuss him
> > >
> > > *now*,
> > >
> > >>>why
> > >>>
> > >>>>did his absence not mean we could not discuss him *before*, when you
> > >>
> > >>were
> > >>
> > >>>>fully involved in these threads?
> > >>>> Your capriciousness is so obvious, Renfield, as is your
> > >
> > > unilateral
> > >
> > >>>and
> > >>>
> > >>>>rather questionable applications of what you would claim are polite
> > >>>>standards.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Anastasia
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Like I say, I'm not discussing him, but if you want to talk about
> > >
> > > Hitler,
> > >
> > >>go
> > >>
> > >>>ahead.
> > >>
> > >> I see you still will resort to rhetoric, little demon. I will
> > >
> > > discuss
> > >
> > >>what I like; and I simply noted that the standard you presumed to
invoke
> > >>yesterday was not the standard prior. You invoked the standard out of
> > >>convenience and, I am sure, a recognition of the fact that your
position
> > >
> > > was
> > >
> > >>indefensible, but that was not your *stated* reason. So you were
being
> > >>disingenuous.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I mean, screw Godwin.
> > >>
> > >> It is a stupid "rule."
> > >>
> > >> Anastasia
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Discuss what you like. I mean screw godwin, I agree it is a stupid
rule. All
> > > I'm saying is that I'm not gonna be drawn on Jason, but I might be
drawn on
> > > Hitler.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Translation; "let's change the subject".
>
> Long version of translation: I am a troll. I used Jason as an excuse
> to troll. Jason the phony preacher was so embarrassed that he had to
> leave. Even after being caught with sock puppets I don't have enough
> common sense to be embarrassed. I still need to troll so let's change
> the subject and please allow me to troll under a different premise.
> Forget Jason and the sock puppets and pretend I am really just a nice
> misguided soul. Did I tell you about Jesus?
>
You're a troll yourself, Casey.
Had you not trolled me out to begin with, none of our exchanges would of
ever happened.
Uncle Davey
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
|