Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: david.sienkiewicz@attbi.com (David Sienkiewicz)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Position statement - Charles Casey's wife was no better thanaprostitute.
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:05:39 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 65
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <35fa3772.0404110306.1ea7e5c5@posting.google.com>
References: <c58g9k$nck$0@pita.alt.net> <4077e9e6_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c58q2t$g71$0@pita.alt.net> <40782be2$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <veWdc.6227$BR1.3408@okepread03> <c59khn$90l$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081681539 77146 128.100.83.246 (11 Apr 2004 11:05:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:05:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.162.140.41
X-Spam-Level: Level *
X-Spamscanner: mailbox6.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Mar 10 2004 15:18:19, 1.1/5.0 2.63)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 30757 i3BB6kuq034222 mailbox6.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3210
"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message news:<c59khn$90l$0@pita.alt.net>...
> news:veWdc.6227$BR1.3408@okepread03...
> > ""Rev Dr" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> > news:40782be2$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
> > >
> > > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>If Charles Casey's wife was only good to him and a wife to him when
> he
> > > >>>was well and able to provide, and then divorced him and had him put
> out
> on
> the
> > > >>>street when he was unwell, then she was no better than a hooker, and
> the
> > > >>>elders who enabled her to do it, they were like her pimps.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>And you can quote me on that.
> > > >>
> > > >>Nice trolling work.
> > > >>
> > > >>Wassamatter, Davey -- not enough intestines providing you with shit?
> > > >
> > > > I wrote it from the heart.
> > >
> > > Don't bullshit us, Davey. You HAVE no heart. Anyone who can poke fun
> > > at blind people (and then crosspost cruel spam to their newsgroup on top
> > > of it) has no human feelings at all, whatsoever.
> >
> > I do not understand. What is this?
> >
> > Anastasia
> >
>
> Casey wrote something disparaging about blind people,
No, Davey, he didn't.
Now, Davey, how many times have you boasted of your linguistic
abilities?
And how many times have we seen that those abilities are simply
figments of your imagination? How many times, for example, did I ask
you how you could get some statement or another so wrong when you're
such an incredibly talented linguist for whom English is the native
language?
Tell you what, Davey, since you did not bother to give us a reference
to the actual message - and since others have - let's give you the
benefit of the doubt.
Take Charles's comments, and explain how they were disparaging to
blind people and not a common use of illustrative language to make a
point.
I'll wait.
< snip >
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 |
|