Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Position statement - Charles Casey's wife probably wasn't as bad as he claims, after all.
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: www.usenetposts.com
Lines: 32
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <c5b8qo$vc2$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <c58g9k$nck$0@pita.alt.net> <opfg709ojtjhhg6l3ebiened499kapaibo@4ax.com> <c59i6p$37e$0@pita.alt.net> <e6a845aa.0404101825.48abedd6@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081681504 77134 128.100.83.246 (11 Apr 2004 11:05:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox6.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Mar 10 2004 15:18:19, 0.7/5.0 2.63)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 30757 i3BB6Dds034084 mailbox6.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3209
news:e6a845aa.0404101825.48abedd6@posting.google.com...
> Hey "Unc",
>
> This whole thread is out of order. Take this crap to the Jerry
> Springer show where it belongs. I've seen off-topic for t.o. I've
> posted off-topic for t.o. but this thread really tops it. There might
> be some context out there somewhere in another dimension that would
> allow a very sporadic reader of talk.origins like me to make some
> sense of of this "out in left field with no glove on while the ball
> speeds by" thread, but I've neither the time nor patience to bother. I
> suppose I'd need to have followed every thread on this newsgroup
> diligently to know wtf is up and I'm glad I'm totally clueless. It is
> a blessing. Ignorance is bliss in some cases.
>
> This is hideous. Don't clue me in. I don't want to know!!!!
>
Hemi,
OK, I understand your point, but the details were only based on details CC
had already given in T.O as an argument why people with my worldview are all
wrong.
I'll strip t.o. out after this, which was only a leetle exception from my
policy of not featuring on your much erudicite and highly scientificacious
newsgroup.
Uncle Davey
|
|