alt.fan.uncle-daveyPrev. Next
Re: OT: Jason Gastrich Finds His Niche Newsfeeds.com http://www ..
\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank (lflank_nospam@ij.net) 2004/04/10 16:22

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: OT: Jason Gastrich Finds His Niche
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 142
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <407873c9_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <dc55e47f.0404071224.5626f8e5@posting.google.com> <Xns94C53A9D59490dickcrcomcastnet@216.196.97.136> <dc55e47f.0404080945.6c6d39ce@posting.google.com> <1gbxgyt.2ysdj71x07bggN%NOdaycdSPAM@hotmail.com> <Qsldc.5125$BR1.912@okepread03> <c5623n$js7$0@pita.alt.net> <1gbz397.7hk4p51hy6joaN%NOdaycdSPAM@hotmail.com> <c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net> <uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03> <c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net> <7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03> <c59n6v$eup$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081635722 62232 128.100.83.246 (10 Apr 2004 22:22:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <c59n6v$eup$0@pita.alt.net>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Apr 2004 22:23:25.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[709D6260:01C41F4A]
X-Spamscanner: mailbox10.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Mar 10 2004 15:18:19, 1.1/5.0 2.63)
X-Spam-Level: Level *
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 5517 i3AMN5fm009310 mailbox10.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3180



Uncle Davey wrote:


> news:7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03...
>
>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>news:c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net...
>>

>>

>>
>>>news:uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03...
>>>
>>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net...
>>>>     No one believes he does not read these exchanges except for you,
>>>>Renfield, and even the departure of evil does not mean that it cannot
>
> be
>
>>>>discussed.  Stalin has been dead for over 50 years and his evil is
>
> still
>
>>>>discussed, as is Hitler's.  Whether Mr Gastrich is as evil as these
>>>
>>>men--and
>>>
>>>>I do not abide by 'levels' of evil, evil is still evil--we can also
>
> talk
>
>>>>about the evil transgressions of persons such as the evangelists who
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>never posted in Usenet.  A lack of presence does not shield an evil
>>
>>person
>>
>>>>from scrutiny or prosecution.  You are simply avoiding the facts, as
>
> you
>
>>>are
>>>
>>>>wont to do, and the ridiculous part of it is that you interjected
>>
>>yourself
>>
>>>>into these discussions in the first place.  Deciding now that his
>>
>>absence
>>
>>>>means he should not be discussed is interesting consider how long you
>>>
>>>*have*
>>>
>>>>been discussing him.  If his absence means we cannot discuss him
>
> *now*,
>
>>>why
>>>
>>>>did his absence not mean we could not discuss him *before*, when you
>>
>>were
>>
>>>>fully involved in these threads?
>>>>     Your capriciousness is so obvious, Renfield, as is your
>
> unilateral
>
>>>and
>>>
>>>>rather questionable applications of what you would claim are polite
>>>>standards.
>>>>
>>>>     Anastasia
>>>>
>>>
>>>Like I say, I'm not discussing him, but if you want to talk about
>
> Hitler,
>
>>go
>>
>>>ahead.
>>
>>     I see you still will resort to rhetoric, little demon.  I will
>
> discuss
>
>>what I like; and I simply noted that the standard you presumed to invoke
>>yesterday was not the standard prior.  You invoked the standard out of
>>convenience and, I am sure, a recognition of the fact that your position
>
> was
>
>>indefensible, but that was not your *stated* reason.  So you were being
>>disingenuous.
>>
>>
>>>I mean, screw Godwin.
>>
>>     It is a stupid "rule."
>>
>>     Anastasia
>>
>
>
> Discuss what you like. I mean screw godwin, I agree it is a stupid rule. All
> I'm saying is that I'm not gonna be drawn on Jason, but I might be drawn on
> Hitler.
>




Translation;  "let's change the subject".



===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"

Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank

DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
30313233343536
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite