Uncle Davey wrote:
> news:7tVdc.6216$BR1.5954@okepread03...
>
>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>news:c58hq4$qb0$0@pita.alt.net...
>>
>>
>>
>>>news:uMEdc.6138$BR1.5638@okepread03...
>>>
>>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:c574j2$eua$0@pita.alt.net...
>>>> No one believes he does not read these exchanges except for you,
>>>>Renfield, and even the departure of evil does not mean that it cannot
>
> be
>
>>>>discussed. Stalin has been dead for over 50 years and his evil is
>
> still
>
>>>>discussed, as is Hitler's. Whether Mr Gastrich is as evil as these
>>>
>>>men--and
>>>
>>>>I do not abide by 'levels' of evil, evil is still evil--we can also
>
> talk
>
>>>>about the evil transgressions of persons such as the evangelists who
>>
>>have
>>
>>>>never posted in Usenet. A lack of presence does not shield an evil
>>
>>person
>>
>>>>from scrutiny or prosecution. You are simply avoiding the facts, as
>
> you
>
>>>are
>>>
>>>>wont to do, and the ridiculous part of it is that you interjected
>>
>>yourself
>>
>>>>into these discussions in the first place. Deciding now that his
>>
>>absence
>>
>>>>means he should not be discussed is interesting consider how long you
>>>
>>>*have*
>>>
>>>>been discussing him. If his absence means we cannot discuss him
>
> *now*,
>
>>>why
>>>
>>>>did his absence not mean we could not discuss him *before*, when you
>>
>>were
>>
>>>>fully involved in these threads?
>>>> Your capriciousness is so obvious, Renfield, as is your
>
> unilateral
>
>>>and
>>>
>>>>rather questionable applications of what you would claim are polite
>>>>standards.
>>>>
>>>> Anastasia
>>>>
>>>
>>>Like I say, I'm not discussing him, but if you want to talk about
>
> Hitler,
>
>>go
>>
>>>ahead.
>>
>> I see you still will resort to rhetoric, little demon. I will
>
> discuss
>
>>what I like; and I simply noted that the standard you presumed to invoke
>>yesterday was not the standard prior. You invoked the standard out of
>>convenience and, I am sure, a recognition of the fact that your position
>
> was
>
>>indefensible, but that was not your *stated* reason. So you were being
>>disingenuous.
>>
>>
>>>I mean, screw Godwin.
>>
>> It is a stupid "rule."
>>
>> Anastasia
>>
>
>
> Discuss what you like. I mean screw godwin, I agree it is a stupid rule. All
> I'm saying is that I'm not gonna be drawn on Jason, but I might be drawn on
> Hitler.
>
Translation; "let's change the subject".
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
|