Anastasia wrote:
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> news:c59i6p$37e$0@pita.alt.net...
>
>
>
>>news:opfg709ojtjhhg6l3ebiened499kapaibo@4ax.com...
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:54:01 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>>><noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>If Charles Casey's wife was only good to him and a wife to him when he
>>
>>was
>>
>>>>well and able to provide, and then divorced him and had him put out on
>>
>>the
>>
>>>>street when he was unwell, then she was no better than a hooker, and
>
> the
>
>>>>elders who enabled her to do it, they were like her pimps.
>>>>
>>>>And you can quote me on that.
>>>>
>>>>Uncle Davey
>>>>
>>>
>>>If my children read this post just how the hell do you think that they
>>>will feel? This is the most thoughtless action you have ever taken. No
>>>matter what she has done _*OUR*_ children do not deserve to read
>>>statements like this one. I don't give a flying fuck how you attempt
>>>to justify this you are one sick fucking troll with the brain capacity
>>>equal to a pile of dog shit.
>>>
>>>You need help. There isn't a moral bone in your body. God damn I can't
>>>believe how fucking low you can go. How the hell do you look at
>>>yourself in the mirror? Get help you sick fuck.
>>
>>Now you are completely out of order. You told us exactly what she had
>
> done,
>
>>this is the analysis of what she did.
>
>
> Your 'analysis' was completely inappropriate. Is your ego so vast that
> you are under the impression that you must render such opinions on these
> subjects? Regardless of what you may have assumed, your comments were evil.
>
>
>>If your kids are gonna be upset, then why just at this, and not at you
>>giving the details of what she did in an equally public way?
>
>
> Perhaps something as simple as a 'matter of perspective' might be a
> consideration. Just as you might be more charitable toward a 'brother' in
> Christ such as Jason Gastrich while others are not, it is reasonable to
> assume that the children might be more tolerant of their father.
>
>
>>You're a moron, Casey.
>
>
> Repentence in your theology seems to last less than a day. You are an
> vicious, evil little demon to play with the emotions of another human being
> in this way as part of your 'performance art.'
>
>
>>I'm beginning to see that she didn't divorce you for
>>disability after all, but for not being possible to live with and not
>
> being
>
>>possible to please.
>
>
> I am not going to ask how you determined that. I am going to observe
> that you seek to make hurtful, evil statements in retaliation for what was
> said to you, instead of taking the Lord's instructions in these matters. If
> one chooses to be public about painful episodes, perhaps that is their form
> of therapy, but the gracious person with the 'class' you so quickly presume
> for yourself and allege is not in others would dictate that, at best, a
> gentle, encouraging comment would be a good response. You did not do that.
> You were insulted by the response, so you insulted in turn. You once again
> show that your faith is a sham, and you are an evil, embittered, hateful
> little man.
>
"Little" being the operative word there.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 |
|